4,993
edits
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
=== begging the question === | === begging the question === | ||
=== broken leg fallacy === | |||
*presents a solution for a problem caused by that or a related solution | |||
*i.e, break the leg, then offer to fix it | |||
===circular argument === | |||
*argument whose premise is its own conclusion | |||
*i.e., restates the argument rather than proving it | |||
*ex. "''She's a great skater because she skates well''" | |||
===confusing credentials for evidence=== | |||
*i.e., "98% of dentists recommend flossing" | |||
**does not provide evidence for the benefits of flossing, just that supposed experts say so | |||
===either-or fallacy=== | |||
*fallacy of relevance | *incorrectly argues only two options or possibilities | ||
===fallacy of relevance=== | |||
===false equivalence=== | |||
*illogical comparison of dissimilar subjects | |||
*i.e., comparing "apples to oranges" | |||
===genetic fallacy=== | |||
*fallacy that of the origins of something determine its value | |||
**ex., the VW was designed by Hitler, and Hitler is evil, therefore the VW is evil | **ex., the VW was designed by Hitler, and Hitler is evil, therefore the VW is evil | ||
* | === Gish gallop === | ||
** | * rapid use of multiple arguments in order to overwhelm a debate or argument | ||
*''ignoratio elenchi'' an argument that misses the point | ** avoids scrutiny of individual arguments | ||
** named for Duane Gish who spoke rapidly and without allowing the opponent to intervene or analyze each individual arguments | |||
*** "gallap" indicates rapidly running horse | |||
**ex., "'' | * defense against a Gish gallop is achieved by focusing on only one or a few of the core arguments that would thereby undermined the logical basis of all the others presented in the Gish gallop | ||
===hasty generalization=== | |||
===''ignoratio elenchi''=== | |||
* an argument that misses the point | |||
===moral equivalence fallacy=== | |||
*illogically compares things of distinct moral or ethical dimensions | |||
**ex., "''Any politician that disagrees with me is a Nazi!''" | |||
===non sequitur=== | |||
*" Humpty Dumptying" or "Humpty Dumptyisms": | |||
*= an "arbitrary redefinition" like that used by Humpty Dumpty in "Alice in Wonderland" | |||
*who tells Alice, "“When I use a word it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” | |||
===red herring=== | |||
===strawman fallacy=== | |||
*= the target of an argument (the "strawman") has nothing to do with the actual argument | |||
*weak analogy | *weak analogy | ||
*see | *see |