Jump to content

Clause (grammar): Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 247: Line 247:
*** vs. "Glue, that sticks to both my fingers and the paper, is a pain"
*** vs. "Glue, that sticks to both my fingers and the paper, is a pain"
**** since the parenthetical phrase is "non-defining" (can be removed), that would leave us with only "Glue is a pain" which lacks the defining information as to what type of glue is a pain, the kind "that sticks to both my fingers and the paper"
**** since the parenthetical phrase is "non-defining" (can be removed), that would leave us with only "Glue is a pain" which lacks the defining information as to what type of glue is a pain, the kind "that sticks to both my fingers and the paper"
*** "Dogs ''that are friendly'' are nice"
**** ''that are friendly'' is restrictive because the sentence would otherwise be "Dogs are nice"
***** by adding ''that are friendly'', we have necessary information to make a meaningful sentence
** non-restrictive clauses do not change the meaning of the sentence:
*** "Friendly dogs, which I like, are nice"
**** the main clause, 'Friendly dogs are nice" is meaning.
***** adding "which I like" does not change the meaning of the sentence
==== because: when to use a comma ====
==== because: when to use a comma ====
* ''because'' is a subordinating conjunction and not a relative pronoun
* ''because'' is a subordinating conjunction and not a relative pronoun