Jump to content

Common historical fallacies: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
** whereas, after 1800, slave population increased dramatically, overtaking white populations in many areas of the south
** whereas, after 1800, slave population increased dramatically, overtaking white populations in many areas of the south
*** therefore slavery was not the basis of the colonial development
*** therefore slavery was not the basis of the colonial development
*
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Caption text
|Year
|Free Population
|increase %
|Slave Population
|increase %
|-
|-
! Header text !! Header text !! Header text !! Header text !! Header text
|1610
|350
|n/a
|n/a
|n/a
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1620
|2300
|657.1%
|n/a
|n/a
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1630
|4540
|197.4%
|60
|30.0%
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1640
|26003
|572.8%
|597
|290.2%
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1650
|48800
|187.7%
|1600
|32.8%
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1660
|72180
|147.9%
|2920
|78.8%
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1670
|107365
|148.7%
|4535
|100.6%
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1680
|144529
|134.6%
|6971
|90.5%
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1690
|193671
|134.0%
|16729
|99.5%
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1700
|223083
|115.2%
|27817
|86.0%
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1710
|286834
|128.6%
|44866
|111.6%
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1720
|397361
|138.5%
|68839
|107.7%
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1730
|538379
|135.5%
|91021
|97.8%
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1740
|755576
|140.3%
|150024
|103.6%
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1750
|934380
|123.7%
|236420
|88.1%
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1760
|1267794
|135.7%
|325806
|109.7%
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1770
|1688278
|133.2%
|459822
|98.1%
|-
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|1780
|-
|2204980
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|130.6%
|-
|575420
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|98.1%
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|}
|}
*
==== logical fallacy 2: colonial per capita wealth not reliant upon slavery ====
==== logical fallacy 2: colonial per capita wealth not reliant upon slavery ====
* as a proportion of per capita private wealth in 1774:
* as a proportion of per capita private wealth in 1774: