Literary Analysis and Criticism: Difference between revisions

From A+ Club Lesson Planner & Study Guide
(started page)
 
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Literary Analysis and Criticism'''
'''Literary Analysis and Criticism'''


== Criticism definition ==
* from "critical"
** adjective to discern, judge
** see [[critical thought]]
* in literature, "criticism" involves assessment of a work through
** analysis of literary techniques and their effectiveness
** other literary merits
** other literary faults
== Summarizing ==
* plot, setting, narrator, character, conflict, change, connection, reflection, language, and theme.
== Literary analysis ==
=== author background ===
* author biography & background
** ''who, when, where?''
* author historical context
** ''what was going on around the author at the time of the authoriship''
* author publications
** ''what else did the author do? how does it speak to this work?''
* author critical reception
** purposes and points of view of critics and their criticism
=== author purpose ===
* ''why this work?''
* ''for what goal or purpose?''
=== identity & audience ===
* does the author address or write from a particular identity?
* who is the intended audience?
** does the audience share the author's or intended literary identity?
** or does the author intend to share it with or explain it to a distinct audience?
=== textual analysis: ===
* Literary scene: ''when, where, what''
* Voice: ''told from what point of view?''
* Structure: ''sections, chapters, etc.''
* Plot or narrative: ''what happens?''
* Plot development: ''how does the author develop the narrative?''
* Tone: ''what's the author's or text's "mood"?''
* Voice
* Character: ''what's the point, purpose and meaning of characters, esp. author choice of names (aka "characterization")''
* Themes and undertones: ''what's the underlying story or purpose here? (aka "reading between the lines")''
* Literary devices: how does the author present, develop and draw out those themes and undertones
** metaphor
** exaggeration
** personification
** irony
** symbolism
* Moral purpose: ''what does the author want us to learn?''
== Journey of the hero ==
12 Elements of the hero's journey:
1. background, life as normal
2. the call
3. refusal of the call
4. mentor
5. passing the threshhold (heading into the journey)
6. encounter allies and enemies
7. tests and challenges
8. the "innermost cave" (despair moment)
9. seizing the sword: facing the enemy head on
10. the ultimate ordeal
11. resurrection: hero brought back to life, literally
12. Returning w/ the elixir and return to normal life
* see : Joesph Campbell's "The Power of Myth"
** the monomyth of call to adventure, tests, and resurrection


== Literary Criticism ==
== Literary Criticism ==
=== George Orwell ===  
=== George Orwell ===  
* Politics and the English Language
* '''''Politics and the English Language'''''
** essay on honesty and clarity of language  
** essay on honesty and clarity of language  
** argues against euphemisms and euphemistic language
** argues against euphemisms and euphemistic language
** online sources:
** online sources:


== Thomas C. Foster==  
=== Sokal affair ===
* How to Read Literature Like a Professor: A Lively and Entertaining Guide to Reading Between the Lines  
 
** online sources:  
* Professor of Physics Alan Sokal published a paper purporting to take seriously the idea that the laws of physics are social constructs
*** [https://cleveland.rrps.net/UserFiles/Servers/Server_134060/File/Announcements%20K.%20Griego/How%20to%20Read%20Literature%20Like%20a%20Professor.pdf Cleveland.rrps.net full text]
** he was satirizing similar theories in the social sciences, especially postmodern studies
*** [https://mseffie.com/assignments/professor/How%20to%20Read%20Literature%20like%20a%20Professor%202nd.pdf Mseffie.com full text]
* his paper: [https://physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/transgress_v2/transgress_v2_singlefile.html Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity (nyu.edu)]
*** [https://www.litcharts.com/lit/how-to-read-literature-like-a-professor LitCHarts.com]
* see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair
 
== How to Read Literature Like a Professor ==  
* by Thomas C. Foster: "How to Read Literature Like a Professor: A Lively and Entertaining Guide to Reading Between the Lines"
** Themes, advice, and quotations
*** "Fiction and poetry and drama are not necessarily playgrounds for the overly literal" (p. << to cite)
*** "No literary Christ figure can ever be as pure, as perfect, as divine as Jesus Christ. Here as elsewhere, one does well to remember that writing literature is an exercise of the imagination. And so is reading it."
*** to bring our imaginations to bear on a story if we are to see all its possibilities; otherwise it’s just about somebody who did something." (p. << to cite)
* online sources:  
** [https://cleveland.rrps.net/UserFiles/Servers/Server_134060/File/Announcements%20K.%20Griego/How%20to%20Read%20Literature%20Like%20a%20Professor.pdf Cleveland.rrps.net full text]
** [https://mseffie.com/assignments/professor/How%20to%20Read%20Literature%20like%20a%20Professor%202nd.pdf Mseffie.com full text]
** [https://www.litcharts.com/lit/how-to-read-literature-like-a-professor LitCHarts.com]

Latest revision as of 22:37, 29 July 2024

Literary Analysis and Criticism

Criticism definition[edit | edit source]

  • in literature, "criticism" involves assessment of a work through
    • analysis of literary techniques and their effectiveness
    • other literary merits
    • other literary faults

Summarizing[edit | edit source]

  • plot, setting, narrator, character, conflict, change, connection, reflection, language, and theme.

Literary analysis[edit | edit source]

author background[edit | edit source]

  • author biography & background
    • who, when, where?
  • author historical context
    • what was going on around the author at the time of the authoriship
  • author publications
    • what else did the author do? how does it speak to this work?
  • author critical reception
    • purposes and points of view of critics and their criticism

author purpose[edit | edit source]

  • why this work?
  • for what goal or purpose?

identity & audience[edit | edit source]

  • does the author address or write from a particular identity?
  • who is the intended audience?
    • does the audience share the author's or intended literary identity?
    • or does the author intend to share it with or explain it to a distinct audience?

textual analysis:[edit | edit source]

  • Literary scene: when, where, what
  • Voice: told from what point of view?
  • Structure: sections, chapters, etc.
  • Plot or narrative: what happens?
  • Plot development: how does the author develop the narrative?
  • Tone: what's the author's or text's "mood"?
  • Voice
  • Character: what's the point, purpose and meaning of characters, esp. author choice of names (aka "characterization")
  • Themes and undertones: what's the underlying story or purpose here? (aka "reading between the lines")
  • Literary devices: how does the author present, develop and draw out those themes and undertones
    • metaphor
    • exaggeration
    • personification
    • irony
    • symbolism
  • Moral purpose: what does the author want us to learn?

Journey of the hero[edit | edit source]

12 Elements of the hero's journey:

1. background, life as normal

2. the call

3. refusal of the call

4. mentor

5. passing the threshhold (heading into the journey)

6. encounter allies and enemies

7. tests and challenges

8. the "innermost cave" (despair moment)

9. seizing the sword: facing the enemy head on

10. the ultimate ordeal

11. resurrection: hero brought back to life, literally

12. Returning w/ the elixir and return to normal life

  • see : Joesph Campbell's "The Power of Myth"
    • the monomyth of call to adventure, tests, and resurrection

Literary Criticism[edit | edit source]

George Orwell[edit | edit source]

  • Politics and the English Language
    • essay on honesty and clarity of language
    • argues against euphemisms and euphemistic language
    • online sources:

Sokal affair[edit | edit source]

How to Read Literature Like a Professor[edit | edit source]

  • by Thomas C. Foster: "How to Read Literature Like a Professor: A Lively and Entertaining Guide to Reading Between the Lines"
    • Themes, advice, and quotations
      • "Fiction and poetry and drama are not necessarily playgrounds for the overly literal" (p. << to cite)
      • "No literary Christ figure can ever be as pure, as perfect, as divine as Jesus Christ. Here as elsewhere, one does well to remember that writing literature is an exercise of the imagination. And so is reading it."
      • to bring our imaginations to bear on a story if we are to see all its possibilities; otherwise it’s just about somebody who did something." (p. << to cite)
  • online sources: