Common historical fallacies

From A+ Club Lesson Planner & Study Guide
Revision as of 20:54, 18 February 2022 by Bromley (talk | contribs) (Created page with "'''Creating Common historical fallacies taught by high school & other teachers''' * teachers have a point of view that inescapably informs their teaching * the best teachers...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Creating Common historical fallacies taught by high school & other teachers

  • teachers have a point of view that inescapably informs their teaching
  • the best teachers "teach" not "preach"
    • but even the most objectively-minded teacher has as a point of view, an underlying outlook

US History fallacies[edit | edit source]

Slavery was the basis of the American economy[edit | edit source]

Enslaved populations in the Thirteen Colonies in 1770.[1]
Evolution of the enslaved population of the United States as a percentage of the population of each state, 1790–1860

logical fallacy 1: colonial slave v. overall population growth[edit | edit source]

    • the growth of colonial African slavery was linear until the development of the cotton gin
      • but the growth of the overall colonial economy was exponential
      • therefore slavery was not the basis of the colonial American economy

logical fallacy 2: value of slave-produced goods v. overall economy[edit | edit source]

  • as a proportion of per capita private wealth in 1774:
  • chart to be completed
Wealth source All 13 colonies New England Middle Colonies South
Land 49.6%
Servants & Slaves 28.0%
Farm & Non-Farm equipment, livestock, Materials Durables & Perishables 22.9%
Financial Assets 16.2
    • slaves & indentured servants represented 21.3%
    • the labor of colonial African slavery was focused on "cash crops" of rice, indigo, tobacco


=== late 1700s to early 1800s manumission from wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Carter_III#Manumission

Manumission<br>
In the years after the Revolutionary War, Virginia's legislature (having barred the slave trade in 1778) passed several laws sympathetic to freeing slaves, although it did not pass a law legalizing manumission until 1782, and throttled many petitions for wider emancipation. Numerous slaveholders in the Chesapeake Bay area freed their slaves, often in their wills (like Quaker John Pleasants) or deeds, and noted principles of equality and Revolutionary ideals as reason for their decisions. The number of free African Americans increased in the Upper South from less than one percent before the Revolution, to 10 percent by 1810. In Delaware, three-fourths of the slaves had been freed by 1810. In the decade after the act's passage, Virginians had freed 10,000 slaves, without visible social disruptions. The price of slaves reached a 20-year low as the percentage listed as "black, tithable" (i.e. slaves) fell below 40%, the lowest point in the century. However, Virginia's courts sidestepped issuing appellate decisions ratifying emancipation until 1799, and the methodology of within-life emancipation was not established.