Clause (grammar): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Clause''' | |||
* = a '''part of a sentence''' that has a '''subject''' and a '''verb''' | |||
** and may or may not be a complete sentence or thought | |||
== What a clause is and is not == | |||
* a clause is part of a sentence | |||
** a ''sentence'' is a grammatically correct and complete thought | |||
*** i.e., it contains a subject and a verb and completes a thought | |||
**** ex. "I go." = a sentence bc it contains and subject and verb and completes a thought | |||
**** whereas, "I send" contains a subject and verb but is not a complete thought | |||
***** "send" is a transitive verb that requires an object, as in "I send a letter" | |||
*** a sentence may contain one or more clauses | |||
** ''phrase'' = a part of a sentence that has two or more words but <u>does not have both a subject and a verb</u> | |||
*** if a sentence part contains a subject and a verb, it is a clause | |||
* note: Santa is not a clause | |||
* sources for clauses: | |||
** [https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/grammar/phrases-clauses-and-sentences/types-of-clauses Types of Clauses (cliffnotes.com)] | |||
** [[http://www.kentlaw.edu/academics/lrw/grinker/LwtaClauses__Restrictive_and_Nonrest.htm Clauses - Restrictive and Nonrestrictive (kentlaw.edu)] | |||
*** this source is interesting as it addresses precision in language in terms of court cases and the law | |||
== main or dominant clause == | |||
* main or dominant clause = an IC (independent clause) | |||
* the "main" clause is the clause the creates the "main idea" of the sentence | |||
** = that part of the sentence that makes the complete and most important, or "dominant" thought of the phrase | |||
*** i.e., the main clause or part of the sentence that states its primary purpose or idea | |||
** everything else is additional information | |||
* for the SAT test, the "dominant /main clause" is that core idea of a sentence that is the focus of the sentence | |||
** SAT tests measure [[#Emphasis shift]] | |||
** emphasis shift measures if the correct form of the sentence "emphasizes" the core or main idea of the sentence | |||
** passive voice de-emphasizes the dominant clause | |||
*** i.e. OBJECT VERB SUBJECT | |||
** dominant /main clauses employ direct voice, i.e. SVO | |||
=== independent clause === | |||
* ''Independent Clause (IC) | |||
* = a ''sentence part'' that can stand as a complete sentence and thought | |||
** it is a clause because it is attached to or has another clause/s attached to it (otherwise it'd just be a sentence) | |||
* IC contains SUBJECT + VERB at a minimum (SV) | |||
* IC usually contains SUBJECT VERB OBJECT (SVO) | |||
* since SUBJECT VERB OBJECT form the core of a sentence there is no punctuation separating them, with the following exceptions: | |||
# parenthetical information (commas, dashes and parentheses) can separate SVO from each other | |||
** i.e., S (parenthetical info) V (parenthetical info) O | |||
* click EXPAND for examples of parenthetical separation of S from V and O: | |||
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"> | |||
* parentheses: S (parenthetical info) V (parenthetical info) O | |||
* commas: S, parenthetical info, V, parenthetical info, O | |||
* dashes: S -- parenthetical info -- V -- parenthetical info -- O | |||
* ex. "Alex, an experienced pilot, landed the plane expertly." | |||
*** S= Alex V= landed O= plane | |||
** other parenthetical punctuation: | |||
** "Alex (an experienced pilot) landed the plane expertly." | |||
*** "Alex -- an experienced pilot -- landed the plane expertly." | |||
** two commas, two dashes or two parentheses = parenthetical phrase | |||
*** ex. Alex, and experienced pilot, landed, for the second time that day, the plane expertly. | |||
***** this is an awkward sentence but using it here to demonstrate how commas can separate a SUBJECT VERB OBJECT if used parenthetically | |||
*** compare this construction: | |||
**** "Alex, an experienced pilot, landed the plane expertly." to: | |||
**** "The experienced pilot, Alex, landed the plane expertly" | |||
**** "The experienced pilot Alex landed the plane expertly" | |||
*** each form creates a different emphasis | |||
**** in this case, the parenthetical construction emphasizes that it was Alex who landed the plane and that | |||
*** if, for example, Alex was an inexperienced pilot, we might prefer a construction that emphasizes it, so, | |||
**** instead of, "Alex, an inexperienced pilot, landed the plane expertly." | |||
**** we might say, "The inexperienced pilot, Alex, landed the plane expertly" or "The inexperienced pilot Alex landed the plane expertly" | |||
</div> | |||
* click EXPAND for example of SVO lists: | |||
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"> | |||
* S, S V O | |||
* S, S and S V and V O | |||
* S, S and S V, and V O | |||
* S, S and S V, V and V O and O | |||
* S, S and S V, V and V O, O and O | |||
** note that with commas that separate a subject, verb, and/or object the final word in the list must not be separated from the related S V or O | |||
*ex. | |||
** "Alex, Nia, and Joan are all experienced pilots" | |||
** "Alex, Nia, and Joan relied on, used, and proved their skills by landing their planes expertly" | |||
</div> | |||
=== dependent clause === | |||
* "Dependent Clause" (DC) is a sentence part that contains a subject and a verb but does not complete a thought | |||
* also called "subordinate clause" | |||
** DC clauses are therefore attached to an IC that completes the clause as a complete sentence and/or thought | |||
** DC clauses add information to ''but are not necessary for'' the IC to make sense | |||
* Note: technically, a sentence part that does not contain both a noun and a verb is a phrase | |||
** yet non-IC sentence parts are commonly referred to as "dependent clauses" when they are actually "phrases" if they do not contain a subject + verb | |||
Click EXPAND for examples of DC: | |||
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"> | |||
* "Since I ate breakfast late, I'll skip lunch" | |||
** "Since I ate" = an incomplete thought and so not an IC | |||
* example of a phrase that is '''not''' a clause as it does not contain a verb: | |||
** "Going to the store, I realized I left my wallet at home." | |||
*** ''going'' = an -ing verb acting as a modifier or adjective and known as a "participal" | |||
*** therefore, "going to the store" = a "participial phrase" and is not a DC | |||
*** see | |||
**** [https://grammar.yourdictionary.com/grammar/sentences/participial-phrases.html Participial Phrases (yourdictionary.com)] | |||
**** [https://www.gingersoftware.com/content/grammar-rules/gerund-phrase/ gerund-phrase (gingersoftware.com)] | |||
</div> | |||
* see: | |||
** [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/punctuation/independent_and_dependent_clauses/index.html Identifying Independent and Dependent Clauses (owl.purdue.edu)] | |||
** [https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/difference-between-dependent-independent-clause The Difference Between Dependent and Independent Clauses (merriam-webster.com)] | |||
=== subordinate clause === | |||
* subordinate clause is another name for a DC | |||
** we usually think of a subordinate clause as one that is formed by adding a subordinating conjunction | |||
** however, technically there are three types of subordinate clauses: | |||
**# adverbial clause: defines a verb, usually in terms of time, duration, extent, or condition (if) | |||
**# noun clause: acts as a noun | |||
**# relative clause: acts as an adjective to define a noun; can be restrictive or non-restrictive (see below) | |||
* however, here will think of subordinate clauses as those that add additional and not required, or requisite, information to the main clause | |||
** in this sense, subordinate clauses are preceded by "subordinating conjunctions" (see below) | |||
=== subordinating conjunction === | |||
* Subordinating conjunction "subordinates" an IC into a DC | |||
** i.e, (SC) renders or turns an IC into a DC | |||
** the reason is the the SC creates the need for additional information after the SVO | |||
** ex. "I love baseball" = a complete sentence and thought | |||
** by adding a SC to the sentence, it is no longer a complete thought: | |||
** ex. "Since I love baseball" | |||
*** "Since" = SC and it "subordinates the IC "I love baseball" by creating the need for additional information in order to complete the thought: | |||
*** "Since I love baseball, I watch it every chance I get." | |||
* Click here for list of and more on [[Grammar#subordinating_conjunctions (see Grammar entry)]] | |||
=== Relative clause === | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px; width:40%" | |||
|+ relative pronouns | |||
! Pronoun !! For !! Rule | |||
|- | |||
| who || people || subject (does the action): ''he, she, we, they'' | |||
|- | |||
| whom || people || object (acted upon): ''him, her, us, them'' | |||
|- | |||
| whose || people or things || possessive form of whom: ''his, her, us, their'' | |||
|- | |||
| that || people or things || subject or object: adds required information (no punctuation) | |||
|- | |||
| which || things || subject or object: adds additional information (usually non-restrictive, ie. with a comma) | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="3" | * Source: https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/relative-clauses/ | |||
|} | |||
* a type of "adjective clause" | |||
* = a dependent clause that contains a subject-verb, but provides additional information and is not a complete sentence of thought by itself | |||
* the "subject" of the clause is a pronoun (thus "relative," as pronouns relate to a noun) | |||
* relative clauses are introduced by a relative pronoun (see table) | |||
* relative clauses can be either restrictive or non-restrictive, per below | |||
** ex. | |||
*** "Sue, who is always late, showed up on time." | |||
*** "The PG-13 movie scared me, which was surprising." | |||
* Sources: | |||
** [https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/relative-clauses/ Relative Clauses (unc.edu)] | |||
** [https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammar/clauses Grammar: Relative, Restrictive, and Nonrestrictive Clauses (walenu.edu)] | |||
** [https://www.grammarly.com/blog/using-that-and-which-is-all-about-restrictive-and-non-restrictive-clauses/ Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Clauses—What’s the Difference?(grammarly.com)] | |||
** [https://thewordcounter.com/blog-comma-before-which/ Comma before which (thewordcounter.com)] | |||
** [https://www.softschools.com/examples/grammar/essential_and_nonessential_adjective_clauses_examples/81/# Essential and Nonessential Adjective Clauses Examples (softschools.com)] | |||
==== restrictive relative clause ==== | |||
* goes by various names: necessary, requisite or defining clause | |||
** technically, also an "adjective clause" since it describes a previously stated (antecedent) noun | |||
* "necessary" or "requisite" = the idea is the clause or phrase is necessary | |||
* "defining" = the meaning of the sentence is defined by the clause | |||
** or: the sentence is not a complete thought without the clause | |||
* restrictive clauses are not separated by punctuation | |||
** i.e.: since the information is necessary, there is no pause | |||
** ex.: "Glue that sticks to both my fingers and the paper is a pain" | |||
*** vs. "Glue, that sticks to both my fingers and the paper, is a pain" | |||
**** since the parenthetical phrase is "non-defining" (can be removed), that would leave us with only "Glue is a pain" which lacks the defining information as to what type of glue is a pain, the kind "that sticks to both my fingers and the paper" | |||
==== because: when to use a comma ==== | |||
* ''because'' is a subordinating conjunction and not a relative pronoun | |||
** normally, a subordinate clause preceding the main clause would be separated by a comma: | |||
*** ''Because it rained, we stayed inside" | |||
** and, normally, a subordinate clause following the main clause would not be separated by a comma: | |||
*** ''We stayed inside because it rained'' | |||
*** the reason is because the subordinate clause is requisite (necessary) information | |||
** however, there are times with the subordinate clause starting with because and following the main (independent) clause can be separated by a comma | |||
*** if the information following the because is distinct and not directly explanatory (normally, "because" offers an explanation, making it requisite) | |||
*** ex. ''We didn't play in the rain, because Mom said we might catch a cold'' | |||
**** here, the speaker may wish for the subordinate clause following "because" to offer additional and not requisite information | |||
*** other examples of because preceded by a comma: | |||
**** ''Even if it's scary, don't close your eyes, because you'll miss the best part!'' | |||
**** ''Playing tennis is fun, because it means the weather is good'' | |||
==== non-restrictive relative clause ==== | |||
* or "Non-defining relative clause" | |||
* or "non-essential" clause | |||
** = the additional information added by the clause is not necessary (or essential) for a complete sentence or thought | |||
* ex.: "Glue, which I hate to use, always sticks to my hands." | |||
** "which I hate to use" is not essential to the idea that "Glue always sticks to my hands" | |||
* see Restrictive relative clauses for sources | |||
=== Other types of clauses === | |||
==== adjective clause ==== | |||
* = a dependent clause that contains a subject and verb but acts as a modifier or adjective | |||
* see "relative clause" | |||
==== adverbial clause ==== | |||
* = a subordinate clause created by a subordinating conjunction and adding information to the action of a sentence: | |||
* adverbial clauses define or add information as to ''how, how much, when, where, why'' | |||
* examples: | |||
** ''I'm staying '''until the park closes''''' | |||
** '''''As my grades sank''', my heart sank, as well'' | |||
==== finite and non-finite clauses ==== | |||
* refer to types of clauses with verbs that either show or do not show "tense" (past, present future) | |||
** = not an important category, but one that grammarians refer to in the context of "tense" | |||
* a finite clause shows tense and is usually an ICs | |||
** ex. "Trey sent that text yesterday" | |||
* non-finite clause does not show tense and is usually a DC | |||
* non-finite clause adds information to the main clause (IC), but without marking "tense" (past, present or future) | |||
** it is the IC that shows the tense: | |||
** ex. Working hard, Jeremiah finished his project on time last night" | |||
* the utility of these | |||
* see https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/clauses-finite-and-non-finite | |||
==== noun clause ==== | |||
* = a clause that functions as a thing or idea (nouns) | |||
** ex.: "What I love to eat the most is steak" | |||
*** ""What I love to eat the most" = a clause that operates as the subject to the verb "is" | |||
[[category:grammar]] | [[category:grammar]] | ||
Revision as of 16:39, 11 June 2022
Clause
- = a part of a sentence that has a subject and a verb
- and may or may not be a complete sentence or thought
What a clause is and is not[edit | edit source]
- a clause is part of a sentence
- a sentence is a grammatically correct and complete thought
- i.e., it contains a subject and a verb and completes a thought
- ex. "I go." = a sentence bc it contains and subject and verb and completes a thought
- whereas, "I send" contains a subject and verb but is not a complete thought
- "send" is a transitive verb that requires an object, as in "I send a letter"
- a sentence may contain one or more clauses
- i.e., it contains a subject and a verb and completes a thought
- phrase = a part of a sentence that has two or more words but does not have both a subject and a verb
- if a sentence part contains a subject and a verb, it is a clause
- a sentence is a grammatically correct and complete thought
- note: Santa is not a clause
- sources for clauses:
- Types of Clauses (cliffnotes.com)
- [Clauses - Restrictive and Nonrestrictive (kentlaw.edu)
- this source is interesting as it addresses precision in language in terms of court cases and the law
main or dominant clause[edit | edit source]
- main or dominant clause = an IC (independent clause)
- the "main" clause is the clause the creates the "main idea" of the sentence
- = that part of the sentence that makes the complete and most important, or "dominant" thought of the phrase
- i.e., the main clause or part of the sentence that states its primary purpose or idea
- everything else is additional information
- = that part of the sentence that makes the complete and most important, or "dominant" thought of the phrase
- for the SAT test, the "dominant /main clause" is that core idea of a sentence that is the focus of the sentence
- SAT tests measure #Emphasis shift
- emphasis shift measures if the correct form of the sentence "emphasizes" the core or main idea of the sentence
- passive voice de-emphasizes the dominant clause
- i.e. OBJECT VERB SUBJECT
- dominant /main clauses employ direct voice, i.e. SVO
independent clause[edit | edit source]
- Independent Clause (IC)
- = a sentence part that can stand as a complete sentence and thought
- it is a clause because it is attached to or has another clause/s attached to it (otherwise it'd just be a sentence)
- IC contains SUBJECT + VERB at a minimum (SV)
- IC usually contains SUBJECT VERB OBJECT (SVO)
- since SUBJECT VERB OBJECT form the core of a sentence there is no punctuation separating them, with the following exceptions:
- parenthetical information (commas, dashes and parentheses) can separate SVO from each other
- i.e., S (parenthetical info) V (parenthetical info) O
- click EXPAND for examples of parenthetical separation of S from V and O:
- parentheses: S (parenthetical info) V (parenthetical info) O
- commas: S, parenthetical info, V, parenthetical info, O
- dashes: S -- parenthetical info -- V -- parenthetical info -- O
- ex. "Alex, an experienced pilot, landed the plane expertly."
- S= Alex V= landed O= plane
- other parenthetical punctuation:
- "Alex (an experienced pilot) landed the plane expertly."
- "Alex -- an experienced pilot -- landed the plane expertly."
- two commas, two dashes or two parentheses = parenthetical phrase
- ex. Alex, and experienced pilot, landed, for the second time that day, the plane expertly.
- this is an awkward sentence but using it here to demonstrate how commas can separate a SUBJECT VERB OBJECT if used parenthetically
- compare this construction:
- "Alex, an experienced pilot, landed the plane expertly." to:
- "The experienced pilot, Alex, landed the plane expertly"
- "The experienced pilot Alex landed the plane expertly"
- each form creates a different emphasis
- in this case, the parenthetical construction emphasizes that it was Alex who landed the plane and that
- if, for example, Alex was an inexperienced pilot, we might prefer a construction that emphasizes it, so,
- instead of, "Alex, an inexperienced pilot, landed the plane expertly."
- we might say, "The inexperienced pilot, Alex, landed the plane expertly" or "The inexperienced pilot Alex landed the plane expertly"
- ex. Alex, and experienced pilot, landed, for the second time that day, the plane expertly.
- click EXPAND for example of SVO lists:
- S, S V O
- S, S and S V and V O
- S, S and S V, and V O
- S, S and S V, V and V O and O
- S, S and S V, V and V O, O and O
- note that with commas that separate a subject, verb, and/or object the final word in the list must not be separated from the related S V or O
- ex.
- "Alex, Nia, and Joan are all experienced pilots"
- "Alex, Nia, and Joan relied on, used, and proved their skills by landing their planes expertly"
dependent clause[edit | edit source]
- "Dependent Clause" (DC) is a sentence part that contains a subject and a verb but does not complete a thought
- also called "subordinate clause"
- DC clauses are therefore attached to an IC that completes the clause as a complete sentence and/or thought
- DC clauses add information to but are not necessary for the IC to make sense
- Note: technically, a sentence part that does not contain both a noun and a verb is a phrase
- yet non-IC sentence parts are commonly referred to as "dependent clauses" when they are actually "phrases" if they do not contain a subject + verb
Click EXPAND for examples of DC:
- "Since I ate breakfast late, I'll skip lunch"
- "Since I ate" = an incomplete thought and so not an IC
- example of a phrase that is not a clause as it does not contain a verb:
- "Going to the store, I realized I left my wallet at home."
- going = an -ing verb acting as a modifier or adjective and known as a "participal"
- therefore, "going to the store" = a "participial phrase" and is not a DC
- see
- "Going to the store, I realized I left my wallet at home."
- see:
subordinate clause[edit | edit source]
- subordinate clause is another name for a DC
- we usually think of a subordinate clause as one that is formed by adding a subordinating conjunction
- however, technically there are three types of subordinate clauses:
- adverbial clause: defines a verb, usually in terms of time, duration, extent, or condition (if)
- noun clause: acts as a noun
- relative clause: acts as an adjective to define a noun; can be restrictive or non-restrictive (see below)
- however, here will think of subordinate clauses as those that add additional and not required, or requisite, information to the main clause
- in this sense, subordinate clauses are preceded by "subordinating conjunctions" (see below)
subordinating conjunction[edit | edit source]
- Subordinating conjunction "subordinates" an IC into a DC
- i.e, (SC) renders or turns an IC into a DC
- the reason is the the SC creates the need for additional information after the SVO
- ex. "I love baseball" = a complete sentence and thought
- by adding a SC to the sentence, it is no longer a complete thought:
- ex. "Since I love baseball"
- "Since" = SC and it "subordinates the IC "I love baseball" by creating the need for additional information in order to complete the thought:
- "Since I love baseball, I watch it every chance I get."
- Click here for list of and more on Grammar#subordinating_conjunctions (see Grammar entry)
Relative clause[edit | edit source]
Pronoun | For | Rule |
---|---|---|
who | people | subject (does the action): he, she, we, they |
whom | people | object (acted upon): him, her, us, them |
whose | people or things | possessive form of whom: his, her, us, their |
that | people or things | subject or object: adds required information (no punctuation) |
which | things | subject or object: adds additional information (usually non-restrictive, ie. with a comma) |
* Source: https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/relative-clauses/ |
- a type of "adjective clause"
- = a dependent clause that contains a subject-verb, but provides additional information and is not a complete sentence of thought by itself
- the "subject" of the clause is a pronoun (thus "relative," as pronouns relate to a noun)
- relative clauses are introduced by a relative pronoun (see table)
- relative clauses can be either restrictive or non-restrictive, per below
- ex.
- "Sue, who is always late, showed up on time."
- "The PG-13 movie scared me, which was surprising."
- ex.
- Sources:
restrictive relative clause[edit | edit source]
- goes by various names: necessary, requisite or defining clause
- technically, also an "adjective clause" since it describes a previously stated (antecedent) noun
- "necessary" or "requisite" = the idea is the clause or phrase is necessary
- "defining" = the meaning of the sentence is defined by the clause
- or: the sentence is not a complete thought without the clause
- restrictive clauses are not separated by punctuation
- i.e.: since the information is necessary, there is no pause
- ex.: "Glue that sticks to both my fingers and the paper is a pain"
- vs. "Glue, that sticks to both my fingers and the paper, is a pain"
- since the parenthetical phrase is "non-defining" (can be removed), that would leave us with only "Glue is a pain" which lacks the defining information as to what type of glue is a pain, the kind "that sticks to both my fingers and the paper"
- vs. "Glue, that sticks to both my fingers and the paper, is a pain"
because: when to use a comma[edit | edit source]
- because is a subordinating conjunction and not a relative pronoun
- normally, a subordinate clause preceding the main clause would be separated by a comma:
- Because it rained, we stayed inside"
- and, normally, a subordinate clause following the main clause would not be separated by a comma:
- We stayed inside because it rained
- the reason is because the subordinate clause is requisite (necessary) information
- however, there are times with the subordinate clause starting with because and following the main (independent) clause can be separated by a comma
- if the information following the because is distinct and not directly explanatory (normally, "because" offers an explanation, making it requisite)
- ex. We didn't play in the rain, because Mom said we might catch a cold
- here, the speaker may wish for the subordinate clause following "because" to offer additional and not requisite information
- other examples of because preceded by a comma:
- Even if it's scary, don't close your eyes, because you'll miss the best part!
- Playing tennis is fun, because it means the weather is good
- normally, a subordinate clause preceding the main clause would be separated by a comma:
non-restrictive relative clause[edit | edit source]
- or "Non-defining relative clause"
- or "non-essential" clause
- = the additional information added by the clause is not necessary (or essential) for a complete sentence or thought
- ex.: "Glue, which I hate to use, always sticks to my hands."
- "which I hate to use" is not essential to the idea that "Glue always sticks to my hands"
- see Restrictive relative clauses for sources
Other types of clauses[edit | edit source]
adjective clause[edit | edit source]
- = a dependent clause that contains a subject and verb but acts as a modifier or adjective
- see "relative clause"
adverbial clause[edit | edit source]
- = a subordinate clause created by a subordinating conjunction and adding information to the action of a sentence:
- adverbial clauses define or add information as to how, how much, when, where, why
- examples:
- I'm staying until the park closes
- As my grades sank, my heart sank, as well
finite and non-finite clauses[edit | edit source]
- refer to types of clauses with verbs that either show or do not show "tense" (past, present future)
- = not an important category, but one that grammarians refer to in the context of "tense"
- a finite clause shows tense and is usually an ICs
- ex. "Trey sent that text yesterday"
- non-finite clause does not show tense and is usually a DC
- non-finite clause adds information to the main clause (IC), but without marking "tense" (past, present or future)
- it is the IC that shows the tense:
- ex. Working hard, Jeremiah finished his project on time last night"
- the utility of these
- see https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/clauses-finite-and-non-finite
noun clause[edit | edit source]
- = a clause that functions as a thing or idea (nouns)
- ex.: "What I love to eat the most is steak"
- ""What I love to eat the most" = a clause that operates as the subject to the verb "is"
- ex.: "What I love to eat the most is steak"