Economics: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (→Cost) |
||
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[Category:Social Studies] | [Category:Social Studies] | ||
Economics point of view | |||
== Economists look at human relations and outcomes through certain lenses, including: == | |||
* values & exchange | |||
* utility | |||
* incentives | |||
* impacts | |||
== Useful Economic vocabulary, models & theories == | == Useful Economic vocabulary, models & theories == | ||
=== Cost === | === Cost === | ||
* prospective cost | |||
** a cost of a transaction that may be avoided if action is taken | |||
* sunk cost | * sunk cost | ||
** a cost of a transaction that has already been incurred, and is therefore irretrievable (can't be taken back) | |||
=== goods === | === goods === | ||
Line 19: | Line 29: | ||
* Substitute good | * Substitute good | ||
=== | === labor === | ||
* division of labor | |||
* flexibility of labor | |||
=== externalities === | |||
* = impacts or consequences upon others (external) | |||
* externalities have an inherent duality | |||
** the external actors must be present for the external impact | |||
*** i.e., if nobody lives near the factory, its noise won't bother anyone | |||
**** the noise is an externality only because people can hear it | |||
*** however, those people living near it may have a benefit that is greater than the externality | |||
**** such as jobs, whatever the factory is making, etc. | |||
** from economist Cose | |||
=== Opportunity cost === | === Opportunity cost === | ||
=== Prisoner's Dilemma === | === Prisoner's Dilemma === | ||
* each | * the "prisoner's dilemma" represents a clash of individual versus group interests | ||
** even if choosing collectively would be more rational | ** "dilemma" = a problem for which the solutions all reach a negative outcome | ||
*** as opposed to a [[Paradox|"paradox"]] | |||
* in the prisoner's dilemma, two prisoners must select between 1) confess to the crime or 2) remain silent | |||
** each is held separately and does not know what the other will choose | |||
* Option 1 choices: | |||
** Prisoner 1 (P1) confesses | |||
** Prisoner 2 (P2) remains silent | |||
** outcome: P1 goes free & P2 serves the worst jail sentence with no chance for parole (no chance to be let out of jail early) | |||
* Option 2 choices | |||
** P1 remains silent | |||
** P2 confesses | |||
** outcome: P2 goes free & P1 serves the worst sentence | |||
* Option 3 choices: | |||
** both confess | |||
** outcome: both serve the worst jail sentence but will be allowed "early parole" (let out early) | |||
* Option 4 choices: | |||
** both remain silent | |||
** outcome: both will face a lesser charge and less jail time | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+Prisoner's Dilemma Choice Matrix | |||
!Option | |||
!Best outcome | |||
individually | |||
!Worst outcome | |||
individually | |||
!Worst outcome | |||
collectively | |||
!Best outcome | |||
collectively | |||
!Highest risk | |||
indivdiually | |||
!Lowest risk | |||
individually | |||
|- | |||
|'''Option 1:''' | |||
* P1 confesses/ | |||
* P2 remains silent | |||
|P1 goes free | |||
|P2 serves longest term | |||
| ✔ | |||
| | |||
| ✔ | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|'''Option 2:''' | |||
* P2 confesses/ | |||
* P1 remains silent | |||
|P2 goes free | |||
|P1 serves longest term | |||
|✔ | |||
| | |||
|↑ | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|'''Option 3:''' | |||
* both confess | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|↑ | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|'''Option 4:''' | |||
* both remain silent | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|↑ | |||
|↑ | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|} | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* the most potentially beneficial option for themselves individually, they both will serve the longest jail term | |||
* however, if both choose the | |||
** even if choosing collectively would be more rational & mutually beneficial | |||
* see https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/prisoner-dilemma/ | |||
=== rationing === | === rationing === | ||
=== scarcity === | === scarcity === | ||
Line 29: | Line 143: | ||
* aggregate supply | * aggregate supply | ||
=== Supply & demand === | === Supply & demand === | ||
* Say's Law | |||
** from Jean-Baptiste Say, "A Treatise on Political Economy" (''Traité d'économie politique''), 1803 | |||
* states that production is the source of demand | |||
** production = making things, providing services or things of value) | |||
** i.e, demand for things necessarily follows their production or offering | |||
*** demand may pre-exist something, but nothing of value is exchanged until that thing is produced and offered | |||
** Say's law is criticized for ignoring "gluts" (supply exceeds demand) and monetary impacts (such as inflation or deflation, which can impact demand outside of supply) | |||
* in general, Say's law correctly identifies the source of exchanged value: something must be offered for value | |||
=== Tragedy of the Commons === | === Tragedy of the Commons === | ||
== Corporate governance == | |||
=== ESG === | |||
=== Shareholder Theory === | |||
* for criticism of ESG and support of Shareholder Theory see: [https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-long-term-negative-effects-of-esg-will-be-catastrophic_5032320.html The Long-Term Negative Effects of ESG Will Be Catastrophic] | |||
=== Stakeholder Theory === | |||
== Lesson Plans == | == Lesson Plans == | ||
* [Economics & ethics lesson plan|Economics & ethics lesson plan] | * [[Economics & ethics lesson plan|Economics & ethics lesson plan]] |
Latest revision as of 20:09, 2 April 2023
Economics
- See also [Social Studies Skills|Social Studies Skills]
[Category:Social Studies]
Economics point of view
Economists look at human relations and outcomes through certain lenses, including:[edit | edit source]
- values & exchange
- utility
- incentives
- impacts
Useful Economic vocabulary, models & theories[edit | edit source]
Cost[edit | edit source]
- prospective cost
- a cost of a transaction that may be avoided if action is taken
- sunk cost
- a cost of a transaction that has already been incurred, and is therefore irretrievable (can't be taken back)
goods[edit | edit source]
- Complement good
- Coordination good
- Free goods
- Inferior goods
- Normal goods
- Public good
- services available to all that have no competition, such as utilities
- use of a public good by one person does not reduce its availability to another
- services available to all that have no competition, such as utilities
- Substitute good
labor[edit | edit source]
- division of labor
- flexibility of labor
externalities[edit | edit source]
- = impacts or consequences upon others (external)
- externalities have an inherent duality
- the external actors must be present for the external impact
- i.e., if nobody lives near the factory, its noise won't bother anyone
- the noise is an externality only because people can hear it
- however, those people living near it may have a benefit that is greater than the externality
- such as jobs, whatever the factory is making, etc.
- i.e., if nobody lives near the factory, its noise won't bother anyone
- from economist Cose
- the external actors must be present for the external impact
Opportunity cost[edit | edit source]
Prisoner's Dilemma[edit | edit source]
- the "prisoner's dilemma" represents a clash of individual versus group interests
- "dilemma" = a problem for which the solutions all reach a negative outcome
- as opposed to a "paradox"
- "dilemma" = a problem for which the solutions all reach a negative outcome
- in the prisoner's dilemma, two prisoners must select between 1) confess to the crime or 2) remain silent
- each is held separately and does not know what the other will choose
- Option 1 choices:
- Prisoner 1 (P1) confesses
- Prisoner 2 (P2) remains silent
- outcome: P1 goes free & P2 serves the worst jail sentence with no chance for parole (no chance to be let out of jail early)
- Option 2 choices
- P1 remains silent
- P2 confesses
- outcome: P2 goes free & P1 serves the worst sentence
- Option 3 choices:
- both confess
- outcome: both serve the worst jail sentence but will be allowed "early parole" (let out early)
- Option 4 choices:
- both remain silent
- outcome: both will face a lesser charge and less jail time
Option | Best outcome
individually |
Worst outcome
individually |
Worst outcome
collectively |
Best outcome
collectively |
Highest risk
indivdiually |
Lowest risk
individually |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Option 1:
|
P1 goes free | P2 serves longest term | ✔ | ✔ | ||
Option 2:
|
P2 goes free | P1 serves longest term | ✔ | ↑ | ||
Option 3:
|
↑ | |||||
Option 4:
|
↑ | ↑ | ||||
- the most potentially beneficial option for themselves individually, they both will serve the longest jail term
- however, if both choose the
- even if choosing collectively would be more rational & mutually beneficial
- see https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/prisoner-dilemma/
rationing[edit | edit source]
scarcity[edit | edit source]
- aggregate supply
Supply & demand[edit | edit source]
- Say's Law
- from Jean-Baptiste Say, "A Treatise on Political Economy" (Traité d'économie politique), 1803
- states that production is the source of demand
- production = making things, providing services or things of value)
- i.e, demand for things necessarily follows their production or offering
- demand may pre-exist something, but nothing of value is exchanged until that thing is produced and offered
- Say's law is criticized for ignoring "gluts" (supply exceeds demand) and monetary impacts (such as inflation or deflation, which can impact demand outside of supply)
- in general, Say's law correctly identifies the source of exchanged value: something must be offered for value
Tragedy of the Commons[edit | edit source]
Corporate governance[edit | edit source]
ESG[edit | edit source]
[edit | edit source]
- for criticism of ESG and support of Shareholder Theory see: The Long-Term Negative Effects of ESG Will Be Catastrophic