Rhetorical device: Difference between revisions
m (→ad hominem) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 239: | Line 239: | ||
=== irony === | === irony === | ||
=== Gish gallop === | |||
* rapid use of multiple arguments in order to overwhelm a debate or argument | |||
** avoids scrutiny of individual arguments | |||
** named for Duane Gish who spoke rapidly and without allowing the opponent to intervene or analyze each individual arguments | |||
=== merism === | |||
* stating the extremes of something | |||
** as in "from A to Z" | |||
=== metanoia === | === metanoia === | ||
* re-expressing a statement in a stronger or lesser way | * re-expressing a statement in a stronger or lesser way | ||
* ''Her idea changed our country; indeed, it changed the world!'' | ** ''Her idea changed our country; indeed, it changed the world!'' | ||
* ''metanoia'' means "a change of mind, a new way of seeing" | |||
=== metonymy === | === metonymy === | ||
Line 260: | Line 271: | ||
=== personification === | === personification === | ||
* giving human qualities to objects or ideas | |||
=== trap question === | === trap question === |
Latest revision as of 02:08, 9 June 2024
Rhetorical device / rhetorical devices = language or communication tools used for persuasion
Rhetoric is the art of persuasion, a fundamental component of open, civil society and discourse. Where there is no persuasion, there is mere conformity or, worse, compulsion. Rhetoric underlies a free, democratic society.
Rhetoric is more than a matter of speaking or writing style. It is a combination of 1) speaker & audience; 2) logic; 3) emotion = ethos, logos, pathos. Rhetoric moves ideas, is moved by ideas, and changes behaviors, beliefs, and actions.
Definitions[edit | edit source]
rhetoric[edit | edit source]
- "the art of the use of language for persuasion"
rhetorical[edit | edit source]
- of or having to do with "rhetoric", which is "the art the use of language for persuasion"
device[edit | edit source]
- a technique or tool employed in
- thus, a technique for persuasion
rhetorical device[edit | edit source]
= techniques for persuasion
"rhetorical" in literary analysis[edit | edit source]
- note that in literature, "rhetoric" and "rhetorical"
see also: Rhetoric page entry
Rhetoric[edit | edit source]
- "the art of persuasion"
- one of the three classical arts of discourse (see below)
- Aristotle defined rhetoric as
- "the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion."
- generally, rhetoric is the study of techniques to inform, persuade, or motivate (an audience)
- In the Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, Stephen Ziliak defines rhetoric as:
Rhetoric is employed in both act and perception, in private thought and public communication. It is a means of communication as well as a theory for understanding and criticizing itself and the alternative means of communication. (p. 237)
Trivium - "Three Arts of Discourse"[edit | edit source]
- "trivium" = "the place where three roads meet"
- Sister Miriam Joseph's explanation of the Trivium:
- grammar for expression of thought
- the thing as-it-is-symbolized
- symbols = letters and words
- the thing as-it-is-symbolized
- logic for the art of thought
- the thing as-it-is-known
- rhetoric for communication
- the thing as-it-is-communicated
- use of language and logic to persuade
- grammar for expression of thought
- the trivium became the basis of the medieval "seven liberal arts"
- the trivium (3) and its extension in the "quadrivium" ("four ways") of astronomy, arithmetic (mathematics), geometry, and music
- why arithmetic and geometry are distinct?
- arithmetic or mathematics = pure numbers (i.e. conceptual)
- geometry = number in space (i.e. distance, relation, etc.)
- studies the properties of distance, size, shape and relative positions
- why arithmetic and geometry are distinct?
- the trivium (3) and its extension in the "quadrivium" ("four ways") of astronomy, arithmetic (mathematics), geometry, and music
Grammar[edit | edit source]
- the mechanics of language
- including the "law of identity"
- that states "a horse is a horse, and not a man"
- see Plato's Cratylus
- including the "law of identity"
Logic[edit | edit source]
- the mechanics of thought
- i.e., analysis, deduction, argument
- also, "dialectic"
- = refers to reasoned argumentation, usually between two or more people who debate or discuss a topic with the aim to establish a truth
Rhetoric[edit | edit source]
- application of language and logic for persuasion
- Aristotle saw rhetoric as
- "a combination of the science of logic and of the ethical branch of politics"
- thus it was designed for understanding, discovery and argumentation
- as both argumentation and ethics, rhetoric is truth-seeking
- the art of rhetoric was especially important to the ancient Greeks who developed democracy and civic participation
- rhetoric was a political tool and valued as an essential element of civic society
Aristotle's "Rhetoric"[edit | edit source]
- Aristotle = 4th Century B.C. Greek philosopher who deeply influenced Western thought
- his work, "Rhetoric" or "Art of Rhetoric" studied the art of persuasion
- in it, Aristotle clarified a center ground between the "sophists", who cared only for persuasion, regardless for truth, and Plato (and thus, Socrates) who focused on philosophy and absolute truths
- Plato felt that rhetoric was inherently deceptive, so only philosophy, which focused on discovering the truth
- Aristotle's insight was that rhetoric is a key tool for the discovery of truth
Persuasion[edit | edit source]
- persuasion is the art of influencing another person's attitudes, behaviors, beliefs, choices, intentions or motivations
- persuasion is distinct from coercion
- as such, persuasion marks the fundamental distinguishing element in democratic as opposed to totalitarian society
- coercion is the use of violence, threats of violence, or some form of repercussion in order to control or shape behavior, beliefs, or ideas
- forms of changing belief that are coercive include (and thus are not persuasion)
- indoctrination
- brainwashing
- propagandism
- censorship
- persuasion requires
- reciprocity
- as Stephen Ziliak notes, "rhetoric judges and is judged, it moves and is moved."
- honesty
- which is why Aristotle was so concerned about "ethics"
- logic
- language
- reciprocity
- forms of persuasion
- logic
- rhetorical devices (see below)
- heuristics
- problem solving or argumentation that is not precise but yields an approximate truth or reality
- heuristics are rational but not perfectly logical
- includes:
- educated guess
- trial and error
- applied experience (things turn out as expected from prior experience)
Aristotle's Modes of Persuasion[edit | edit source]
- the commonly referred to modes of persuasion are ethos, logos and pathos
- Aristotle also discussed a fourth mode of persuasion, kairos (see below)
- Aristotle distinguished types of persuasive situations, including
- epideictic = ceremonial speeches (praise or condemnation)
- forensic = judicial, especially for establishing guilt or innocence
- deliberative = persuasion of an audience on an issue or idea
- the purpose of deliberative rhetoric was to pursue the koinon, or common, or greater, good
- deliberative rhetoric was to be used in the four politeia, democracy, oligarchy, aristocracy and monarchy
- and he distinguished two types of "rhetorical proofs"
- proof = a logical argument that is sufficient to establish a truth
- enthymeme = proof by logic (syllogism, or deductive reasoning)
- i.e., if A= B, and B=C, then A=C
- paradeigma = proof by example
- in order to establish a general rule
- he argued that philosophy is too narrow a discipline for practical purposes
- while philosophy is useful for reasoning to a scientific (knowledgeable) certainty or truth
- rhetoric has a larger, practical role in human affairs
- In Rhetoric, Aristotle outlined three main categories of persuasive techniques to employ upon an audience
- (note that the appeal must have an audience!)
- ethos, logos & pathos
- Aristotle agrees with Plato that persuasion can be deceptive and abusive,
- thus while employing "pathos" (passion, emotion), a speaker must also exhibit "ethos" (see below)
Ethos[edit | edit source]
- ethical appeal to establish speaker's credibility and character
- most commonly taught in high school as "appeal to authority" or the "credibility" of the speaker
- wherein the speaker establishes expertise, knowledge, authority or credibility
- however, Aristotle's use of eunoia is essential to understand the meaning of "ethos"
- an "ethos" is a common set of values
- thus the mode of persuasion of ethos must appeal to and reinforce the beliefs, character, and ideals of the audience
- it is from that commonality with the audience that the speaker earns credibility
- for Aristotle ethos consists of a speaker's
- phronesis = wisdom and good judgment
- arete = excellence or virtue
- eunoia = good will between the speaker and the audience
- accordingly, a speaker's credibility may be impugned (disputed) if
- speaker lacks expertise (i.e., speaker lacks authority, experience or knowledge to speak about the topic)
- speaker has a personal interest in the outcome of the debate (i.e., has a personal bias, thus lacks credibility)
- speaker has an ulterior motive in the outcome of the debate (i.e. has an additional reason for taking a position)
Logos[edit | edit source]
- reason
Pathos[edit | edit source]
- appeal to the emotions of an audience via
- sympathy (I feel bad for you) or empathy (I know how you feel)
the three Modes of Persuasion circularity[edit | edit source]
- while not explicit in Aristotle, we can see that each of the modes can be interconnected or self-referential to one another:
Multi-modal argument | Ethos | Logos | Pathos |
---|---|---|---|
A common or shared emotional experience w/ the audience ("I have suffered with you") | y | y | |
A common emotional experience that has a logical conclusion ("Starving babies is mean and also kills them") | y | y | |
A logical argument that leads to a common and/or emotional experience ("If we continue this madness, we will all die" | y | y | y |
Kairos[edit | edit source]
- a well-timed appeal that stays within the context of the moment
- kairos means "the right, critical, or opportune moment"
- arguing something at the right time
- keeping to the persuasive context
Rhetorical devices[edit | edit source]
- see above for Ethos, Logos and Pathos
- additional sections will cover rhetorical devices of counter-argument and repetition
- note
- some of these rhetorical devices may be used to create false or misleading arguments or logical fallacies, or to impugn (insult, insincerely attack) another person or position (ex. "ad hominem")
- many of these devices are also called "literary devices" and so are listed within that category, as well
- see Logical fallacies and Literary devices
ad hominem[edit | edit source]
- personal attack on the opponent as opposed to the opponent's argument
- can be a valid argument; see: Character Attacks: How to Properly Apply the Ad Hominem - Scientific American
alliteration[edit | edit source]
- repetition of sounds
- tightening tentacles terribly perturbs our tentative template
aporia[edit | edit source]
- expression of doubt
- when will this ever end, that is our problem
assonance[edit | edit source]
cacophony[edit | edit source]
- clashing sounds and words meant to convey tension or trouble
consonance[edit | edit source]
irony[edit | edit source]
Gish gallop[edit | edit source]
- rapid use of multiple arguments in order to overwhelm a debate or argument
- avoids scrutiny of individual arguments
- named for Duane Gish who spoke rapidly and without allowing the opponent to intervene or analyze each individual arguments
merism[edit | edit source]
- stating the extremes of something
- as in "from A to Z"
metanoia[edit | edit source]
- re-expressing a statement in a stronger or lesser way
- Her idea changed our country; indeed, it changed the world!
- metanoia means "a change of mind, a new way of seeing"
metonymy[edit | edit source]
- a reference to a person or thing though an office or attribute
- the White House (the president)
- my heart beats for you (love, care)
- those suits care only about themselves (corporate leaders)
onomatopoeia[edit | edit source]
- using words that sound like the mean
paralipsis[edit | edit source]
- see apophasis
personification[edit | edit source]
- giving human qualities to objects or ideas
trap question[edit | edit source]
- a syllogistic (logical) line of questions or thought that lead one's opponent to a logical conclusion in support of one's own argument
- particularly powerful in trials, whereby the witness is "trapped" into an admission of some fact
understatement[edit | edit source]
Rhetorical devices of counterarguments[edit | edit source]
diasyrmus[edit | edit source]
- a ridiculous comparison in order to dismiss a counter argument
derision[edit | edit source]
- ridicule or satire of an opposing argument
- You believe that? I have a bridge to sell you!
procatalepsis[edit | edit source]
- an argument that anticipates a possible objection
- then rebuts those objections
enthymeme[edit | edit source]
- an incomplete logical argument that begs the listener to fill in the answer or one that is already understood
- You can bet he'd never do that. Well, not if he's the kind of person he thinks himself to be.
hyperbole[edit | edit source]
- exaggeration for effect
hypophora[edit | edit source]
- ask a question, then proceed to answer it
Rhetorical devices of repetition[edit | edit source]
anadiplosis[edit | edit source]
- repeating a word or idea between sentence parts
- to each a duck, ducks for all!
- whosoever suffers it, suffers the most
anaphora[edit | edit source]
- repeating a word at the beginning of each clause, sentence or paragraph
- similar to epistrophe
- = repetition of a word or phrase at the end of a cause, sentence or paragraph
- symploce ("sim-ploh-see")
- = use of both anaphora and epistrophe
antanaclasis[edit | edit source]
- repeating a word without interruption
- yes, yes, yes
- why? why? why?
apophasis[edit | edit source]
- also called paralipsis
- author mentions an argument or fact in order to deny it or to deny using it
- also used to mention something indirectly
- = a form of irony
- may be seen as a "passive-aggressive" argument
- in that it states something while apologizing for having stated it
- may be seen as a "passive-aggressive" argument
- examples:
- "But we won't talk about my opponent's disastrous married life"
- "It would be a breach of decorum to mention base morals such as she embodies"
- actual use of paralipses:
- during Prohibition (when sale of alcohol was banned), a grape juice company included this paralipsis on its grape concentrate packaging:
- "After dissolving the brick in a gallon of water, do not place the liquid in a jug away in the cupboard for twenty days, because then it would turn into wine."
- during the 1984 presidential debates, Ronald Reagan, who was much older than his opponent, stated,
- "I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent's youth and inexperience."
- during Prohibition (when sale of alcohol was banned), a grape juice company included this paralipsis on its grape concentrate packaging:
Figurative or literary devices[edit | edit source]
- generally used for literary purposes and effects, these devices may also aid in the persuasive use of rhetoric