Rhetorical device: Difference between revisions
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Rhetorical device / rhetorical devices''' = language or communication tools used for persuasion | |||
Rhetoric is the art of persuasion, a fundamental component of open, civil society and discourse. Where there is no persuasion, there is mere conformity or, worse, compulsion. Rhetoric underlies a free, democratic society. | |||
Rhetoric is more than a matter of speaking or writing <u>style</u>. It is a combination of 1) speaker & audience; 2) logic; 3) emotion = ''ethos, logos, pathos.'' Rhetoric moves ideas, is moved by ideas, and changes behaviors, beliefs, and actions. | |||
== Definitions == | |||
=== rhetoric === | |||
* "the art of the use of language for persuasion" | |||
=== rhetorical === | |||
* of or having to do with "rhetoric", which is "the art the use of language for persuasion" | |||
=== device === | |||
* a technique or tool employed in | |||
* thus, a technique for persuasion | |||
=== rhetorical device === | |||
= techniques for persuasion | |||
=== "rhetorical" in literary analysis === | |||
* note that in literature, "rhetoric" and "rhetorical" | |||
see also: [[Rhetoric]] page entry | |||
== Rhetoric == | |||
* "the art of persuasion" | |||
* one of the three classical arts of discourse (see below) | |||
* Aristotle defined rhetoric as | |||
** "the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion." | |||
* generally, rhetoric is the study of techniques to inform, persuade, or motivate (an audience) | |||
* In the Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, Stephen Ziliak defines rhetoric as: | |||
Rhetoric is employed in both act and perception, in private thought and public communication. It is a means of communication as well as a theory for understanding and criticizing itself and the alternative means of communication. (p. 237) | |||
=== Trivium - "Three Arts of Discourse" === | |||
* "trivium" = "the place where three roads meet" | |||
* [[wikipedia:Sister_Miriam_Joseph|Sister Miriam Joseph]]'s explanation of the Trivium: | |||
** '''grammar''' for expression of thought | |||
*** ''the thing as-it-is-symbolized'' | |||
**** symbols = letters and words | |||
** '''logic''' for the art of thought | |||
*** ''the thing as-it-is-known'' | |||
** '''rhetoric''' for communication | |||
*** ''the thing as-it-is-communicated'' | |||
*** use of language and logic to persuade | |||
* the trivium became the basis of the medieval "seven liberal arts" | |||
** the trivium (3) and its extension in the "quadrivium" ("four ways") of astronomy, arithmetic (mathematics), geometry, and music | |||
*** why arithmetic and geometry are distinct? | |||
**** arithmetic or mathematics = pure numbers (i.e. conceptual) | |||
**** geometry = number in space (i.e. distance, relation, etc.) | |||
***** studies the properties of distance, size, shape and relative positions | |||
==== Grammar ==== | |||
* the mechanics of language | |||
** including the "law of identity" | |||
*** that states "a horse is a horse, and not a man" | |||
*** see Plato's [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-cratylus/ Cratylus] | |||
==== Logic ==== | |||
* the mechanics of thought | |||
** i.e., analysis, deduction, argument | |||
* also, "dialectic" | |||
** = refers to reasoned argumentation, usually between two or more people who debate or discuss a topic with the aim to establish a truth | |||
==== Rhetoric ==== | |||
* application of language and logic for persuasion | |||
* Aristotle saw rhetoric as | |||
** "a combination of the science of logic and of the ethical branch of politics" | |||
** thus it was designed for understanding, discovery and argumentation | |||
** as both argumentation and ethics, rhetoric is truth-seeking | |||
* the art of rhetoric was especially important to the ancient Greeks who developed democracy and civic participation | |||
** rhetoric was a political tool and valued as an essential element of civic society | |||
=== Aristotle's "Rhetoric" === | |||
* Aristotle = 4th Century B.C. Greek philosopher who deeply influenced Western thought | |||
* his work, "Rhetoric" or "Art of Rhetoric" studied the art of persuasion | |||
* in it, Aristotle clarified a center ground between the "sophists", who cared only for persuasion, regardless for truth, and Plato (and thus, Socrates) who focused on philosophy and absolute truths | |||
** Plato felt that rhetoric was inherently deceptive, so only philosophy, which focused on discovering the truth | |||
** Aristotle's insight was that rhetoric is a key tool for the discovery of truth | |||
== Persuasion == | |||
* persuasion is the art of influencing another person's attitudes, behaviors, beliefs, choices, intentions or motivations | |||
* persuasion is distinct from coercion | |||
** as such, persuasion marks the fundamental distinguishing element in democratic as opposed to totalitarian society | |||
** coercion is the use of violence, threats of violence, or some form of repercussion in order to control or shape behavior, beliefs, or ideas | |||
** forms of changing belief that are coercive include (and thus are not persuasion) | |||
*** indoctrination | |||
*** brainwashing | |||
*** propagandism | |||
*** censorship | |||
* persuasion requires | |||
** reciprocity | |||
*** as Stephen Ziliak notes, "rhetoric judges and is judged, it moves and is moved." | |||
** honesty | |||
*** which is why Aristotle was so concerned about "ethics" | |||
** logic | |||
** language | |||
* forms of persuasion | |||
** logic | |||
** rhetorical devices (see below) | |||
** heuristics | |||
*** problem solving or argumentation that is not precise but yields an approximate truth or reality | |||
*** heuristics are rational but not perfectly logical | |||
*** includes: | |||
**** educated guess | |||
**** trial and error | |||
**** applied experience (things turn out as expected from prior experience) | |||
== Aristotle's Modes of Persuasion == | |||
* the commonly referred to modes of persuasion are '''''ethos, logos''''' and '''''pathos''''' | |||
* Aristotle also discussed a fourth mode of persuasion, '''''kairos''''' (see below) | |||
* Aristotle distinguished types of <u>persuasive situations</u>, including | |||
** '''''epideictic''''' = ceremonial speeches (praise or condemnation) | |||
** '''''forensic''''' = judicial, especially for establishing guilt or innocence | |||
** '''''deliberative''''' = persuasion of an audience on an issue or idea | |||
*** the purpose of deliberative rhetoric was to pursue the '''''koinon''','' or common, or greater, good | |||
*** deliberative rhetoric was to be used in the four '''''politeia''''', democracy, oligarchy, aristocracy and monarchy | |||
* and he distinguished two types of "rhetorical proofs" | |||
** proof = a logical argument that is sufficient to establish a truth | |||
** '''''enthymeme''''' = proof by logic (syllogism, or deductive reasoning) | |||
*** i.e., if A= B, and B=C, then A=C | |||
** '''''paradeigma''''' = proof by example | |||
*** in order to establish a general rule | |||
* he argued that philosophy is too narrow a discipline for practical purposes | |||
** while philosophy is useful for reasoning to a scientific (knowledgeable) certainty or truth | |||
** rhetoric has a larger, practical role in human affairs | |||
* In ''Rhetoric'', Aristotle outlined three main categories of persuasive techniques to employ upon an audience | |||
** (note that the appeal must have an audience!) | |||
** ''ethos, logos'' & ''pathos'' | |||
* Aristotle agrees with Plato that persuasion can be deceptive and abusive, | |||
** thus while employing "pathos" (passion, emotion), a speaker must also exhibit "ethos" (see below) | |||
=== Ethos === | |||
* ethical appeal to establish speaker's credibility and character | |||
** most commonly taught in high school as "appeal to authority" or the "credibility" of the speaker | |||
** wherein the speaker establishes expertise, knowledge, authority or credibility | |||
* however, Aristotle's use of '''''eunoia''''' is essential to understand the meaning of "ethos" | |||
** an "ethos" is a common set of values | |||
** thus the mode of persuasion of ethos must appeal to and reinforce the beliefs, character, and ideals of the audience | |||
*** it is from that commonality with the audience that the speaker earns credibility | |||
* for Aristotle ethos consists of a speaker's | |||
** '''''phronesis''''' = wisdom and good judgment | |||
** '''''arete''''' = excellence or virtue | |||
** '''''eunoia''''' = good will between the speaker and the audience | |||
* accordingly, a speaker's credibility may be impugned (disputed) if | |||
** speaker lacks expertise (i.e., speaker lacks authority, experience or knowledge to speak about the topic) | |||
** speaker has a personal interest in the outcome of the debate (i.e., has a personal bias, thus lacks credibility) | |||
** speaker has an ulterior motive in the outcome of the debate (i.e. has an additional reason for taking a position) | |||
=== Logos === | |||
* reason | |||
=== Pathos === | |||
* appeal to the emotions of an audience via | |||
** sympathy (''I feel bad for you'') or empathy (''I know how you feel'') | |||
=== the three Modes of Persuasion circularity === | |||
* while not explicit in Aristotle, we can see that each of the modes can be interconnected or self-referential to one another: | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+Reinforced or Dual Modes of Persuasion | |||
!Multi-modal argument | |||
!Ethos | |||
!Logos | |||
!Pathos | |||
|- | |||
|A common or shared emotional experience w/ the audience ("I have suffered with you") | |||
|''y'' | |||
| | |||
|''y'' | |||
|- | |||
|A common emotional experience that has a logical conclusion ("Starving babies is mean and also kills them") | |||
| | |||
|''y'' | |||
|''y'' | |||
|- | |||
|A logical argument that leads to a common and/or emotional experience ("If we continue this madness, we will all die" | |||
|''y'' | |||
|''y'' | |||
|''y'' | |||
|} | |||
=== Kairos === | |||
* a well-timed appeal that stays within the context of the moment | |||
* ''kairos'' means "the right, critical, or opportune moment" | |||
** arguing something at the right time | |||
** keeping to the persuasive context | |||
== Rhetorical devices == | |||
* see above for Ethos, Logos and Pathos | |||
* additional sections will cover rhetorical devices of counter-argument and repetition | |||
* note | |||
** some of these rhetorical devices may be used to create false or misleading arguments or logical fallacies, or to impugn (insult, insincerely attack) another person or position (ex. "ad hominem") | |||
** many of these devices are also called "literary devices" and so are listed within that category, as well | |||
** see [[Logical fallacy|Logical fallacies]] and [[Literary devices]] | |||
=== ad hominem === | === ad hominem === | ||
=== apophasis === | * personal attack on the opponent as opposed to the opponent's argument | ||
* can be a valid argument; see: [https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/character-attack/ Character Attacks: How to Properly Apply the Ad Hominem - Scientific American] | |||
=== alliteration === | |||
* repetition of sounds | |||
** ''tightening tentacles terribly perturbs our tentative template'' | |||
=== aporia === | |||
* expression of doubt | |||
** ''when will this ever end, that is our problem'' | |||
=== assonance === | |||
=== cacophony === | |||
* clashing sounds and words meant to convey tension or trouble | |||
=== consonance === | |||
=== irony === | |||
=== Gish gallop === | |||
* rapid use of multiple arguments in order to overwhelm a debate or argument | |||
** avoids scrutiny of individual arguments | |||
** named for Duane Gish who spoke rapidly and without allowing the opponent to intervene or analyze each individual arguments | |||
=== merism === | |||
* stating the extremes of something | |||
** as in "from A to Z" | |||
=== metanoia === | |||
* re-expressing a statement in a stronger or lesser way | |||
** ''Her idea changed our country; indeed, it changed the world!'' | |||
* ''metanoia'' means "a change of mind, a new way of seeing" | |||
=== metonymy === | |||
* a reference to a person or thing though an office or attribute | |||
** ''the White House'' (the president) | |||
** ''my heart beats for you'' (love, care) | |||
** ''those suits care only about themselves'' (corporate leaders) | |||
=== onomatopoeia === | |||
* using words that sound like the mean | |||
=== paralipsis === | |||
* see apophasis | |||
=== personification === | |||
* giving human qualities to objects or ideas | |||
=== trap question === | |||
* a syllogistic (logical) line of questions or thought that lead one's opponent to a logical conclusion in support of one's own argument | |||
* particularly powerful in trials, whereby the witness is "trapped" into an admission of some fact | |||
=== understatement === | |||
== Rhetorical devices of counterarguments == | |||
==== diasyrmus ==== | |||
* a ridiculous comparison in order to dismiss a counter argument | |||
==== derision ==== | |||
* ridicule or satire of an opposing argument | |||
** ''You believe that? I have a bridge to sell you!'' | |||
==== procatalepsis ==== | |||
* an argument that anticipates a possible objection | |||
* then rebuts those objections | |||
=== enthymeme === | |||
* an incomplete logical argument that begs the listener to fill in the answer or one that is already understood | |||
** ''You can bet he'd never do that. Well, not if he's the kind of person he thinks himself to be.'' | |||
=== hyperbole === | |||
* also called | * exaggeration for effect | ||
=== hypophora === | |||
* ask a question, then proceed to answer it | |||
== Rhetorical devices of repetition == | |||
==== anadiplosis ==== | |||
* repeating a word or idea between sentence parts | |||
** ''to each a duck, ducks for all!'' | |||
** ''whosoever suffers it, suffers the most'' | |||
==== anaphora ==== | |||
* repeating a word at the beginning of each clause, sentence or paragraph | |||
* similar to '''epistrophe''' | |||
** = repetition of a word or phrase at the end of a cause, sentence or paragraph | |||
* '''symploce''' ("sim-ploh-see") | |||
** = use of both anaphora and epistrophe | |||
==== antanaclasis ==== | |||
* repeating a word without interruption | |||
** ''yes, yes, yes'' | |||
** ''why? why? why?'' | |||
==== apophasis ==== | |||
* also called '''paralipsis''' | |||
* author mentions an argument or fact in order to deny it or to deny using it | * author mentions an argument or fact in order to deny it or to deny using it | ||
* also used to mention something indirectly | * also used to mention something indirectly | ||
Line 20: | Line 350: | ||
* see [[wikipedia:Apophasis|Apophasis - Wikipedia]] | * see [[wikipedia:Apophasis|Apophasis - Wikipedia]] | ||
=== | == Figurative or literary devices == | ||
* generally used for literary purposes and effects, these devices may also aid in the persuasive use of rhetoric | |||
=== imagery === | |||
=== metaphor === | |||
=== simile === | |||
[[Category:Rhetoric]] | [[Category:Rhetoric]] | ||
[[Category:Language Arts]] | [[Category:Language Arts]] | ||
[[Category:Philosophy]] |
Latest revision as of 02:08, 9 June 2024
Rhetorical device / rhetorical devices = language or communication tools used for persuasion
Rhetoric is the art of persuasion, a fundamental component of open, civil society and discourse. Where there is no persuasion, there is mere conformity or, worse, compulsion. Rhetoric underlies a free, democratic society.
Rhetoric is more than a matter of speaking or writing style. It is a combination of 1) speaker & audience; 2) logic; 3) emotion = ethos, logos, pathos. Rhetoric moves ideas, is moved by ideas, and changes behaviors, beliefs, and actions.
Definitions[edit | edit source]
rhetoric[edit | edit source]
- "the art of the use of language for persuasion"
rhetorical[edit | edit source]
- of or having to do with "rhetoric", which is "the art the use of language for persuasion"
device[edit | edit source]
- a technique or tool employed in
- thus, a technique for persuasion
rhetorical device[edit | edit source]
= techniques for persuasion
"rhetorical" in literary analysis[edit | edit source]
- note that in literature, "rhetoric" and "rhetorical"
see also: Rhetoric page entry
Rhetoric[edit | edit source]
- "the art of persuasion"
- one of the three classical arts of discourse (see below)
- Aristotle defined rhetoric as
- "the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion."
- generally, rhetoric is the study of techniques to inform, persuade, or motivate (an audience)
- In the Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, Stephen Ziliak defines rhetoric as:
Rhetoric is employed in both act and perception, in private thought and public communication. It is a means of communication as well as a theory for understanding and criticizing itself and the alternative means of communication. (p. 237)
Trivium - "Three Arts of Discourse"[edit | edit source]
- "trivium" = "the place where three roads meet"
- Sister Miriam Joseph's explanation of the Trivium:
- grammar for expression of thought
- the thing as-it-is-symbolized
- symbols = letters and words
- the thing as-it-is-symbolized
- logic for the art of thought
- the thing as-it-is-known
- rhetoric for communication
- the thing as-it-is-communicated
- use of language and logic to persuade
- grammar for expression of thought
- the trivium became the basis of the medieval "seven liberal arts"
- the trivium (3) and its extension in the "quadrivium" ("four ways") of astronomy, arithmetic (mathematics), geometry, and music
- why arithmetic and geometry are distinct?
- arithmetic or mathematics = pure numbers (i.e. conceptual)
- geometry = number in space (i.e. distance, relation, etc.)
- studies the properties of distance, size, shape and relative positions
- why arithmetic and geometry are distinct?
- the trivium (3) and its extension in the "quadrivium" ("four ways") of astronomy, arithmetic (mathematics), geometry, and music
Grammar[edit | edit source]
- the mechanics of language
- including the "law of identity"
- that states "a horse is a horse, and not a man"
- see Plato's Cratylus
- including the "law of identity"
Logic[edit | edit source]
- the mechanics of thought
- i.e., analysis, deduction, argument
- also, "dialectic"
- = refers to reasoned argumentation, usually between two or more people who debate or discuss a topic with the aim to establish a truth
Rhetoric[edit | edit source]
- application of language and logic for persuasion
- Aristotle saw rhetoric as
- "a combination of the science of logic and of the ethical branch of politics"
- thus it was designed for understanding, discovery and argumentation
- as both argumentation and ethics, rhetoric is truth-seeking
- the art of rhetoric was especially important to the ancient Greeks who developed democracy and civic participation
- rhetoric was a political tool and valued as an essential element of civic society
Aristotle's "Rhetoric"[edit | edit source]
- Aristotle = 4th Century B.C. Greek philosopher who deeply influenced Western thought
- his work, "Rhetoric" or "Art of Rhetoric" studied the art of persuasion
- in it, Aristotle clarified a center ground between the "sophists", who cared only for persuasion, regardless for truth, and Plato (and thus, Socrates) who focused on philosophy and absolute truths
- Plato felt that rhetoric was inherently deceptive, so only philosophy, which focused on discovering the truth
- Aristotle's insight was that rhetoric is a key tool for the discovery of truth
Persuasion[edit | edit source]
- persuasion is the art of influencing another person's attitudes, behaviors, beliefs, choices, intentions or motivations
- persuasion is distinct from coercion
- as such, persuasion marks the fundamental distinguishing element in democratic as opposed to totalitarian society
- coercion is the use of violence, threats of violence, or some form of repercussion in order to control or shape behavior, beliefs, or ideas
- forms of changing belief that are coercive include (and thus are not persuasion)
- indoctrination
- brainwashing
- propagandism
- censorship
- persuasion requires
- reciprocity
- as Stephen Ziliak notes, "rhetoric judges and is judged, it moves and is moved."
- honesty
- which is why Aristotle was so concerned about "ethics"
- logic
- language
- reciprocity
- forms of persuasion
- logic
- rhetorical devices (see below)
- heuristics
- problem solving or argumentation that is not precise but yields an approximate truth or reality
- heuristics are rational but not perfectly logical
- includes:
- educated guess
- trial and error
- applied experience (things turn out as expected from prior experience)
Aristotle's Modes of Persuasion[edit | edit source]
- the commonly referred to modes of persuasion are ethos, logos and pathos
- Aristotle also discussed a fourth mode of persuasion, kairos (see below)
- Aristotle distinguished types of persuasive situations, including
- epideictic = ceremonial speeches (praise or condemnation)
- forensic = judicial, especially for establishing guilt or innocence
- deliberative = persuasion of an audience on an issue or idea
- the purpose of deliberative rhetoric was to pursue the koinon, or common, or greater, good
- deliberative rhetoric was to be used in the four politeia, democracy, oligarchy, aristocracy and monarchy
- and he distinguished two types of "rhetorical proofs"
- proof = a logical argument that is sufficient to establish a truth
- enthymeme = proof by logic (syllogism, or deductive reasoning)
- i.e., if A= B, and B=C, then A=C
- paradeigma = proof by example
- in order to establish a general rule
- he argued that philosophy is too narrow a discipline for practical purposes
- while philosophy is useful for reasoning to a scientific (knowledgeable) certainty or truth
- rhetoric has a larger, practical role in human affairs
- In Rhetoric, Aristotle outlined three main categories of persuasive techniques to employ upon an audience
- (note that the appeal must have an audience!)
- ethos, logos & pathos
- Aristotle agrees with Plato that persuasion can be deceptive and abusive,
- thus while employing "pathos" (passion, emotion), a speaker must also exhibit "ethos" (see below)
Ethos[edit | edit source]
- ethical appeal to establish speaker's credibility and character
- most commonly taught in high school as "appeal to authority" or the "credibility" of the speaker
- wherein the speaker establishes expertise, knowledge, authority or credibility
- however, Aristotle's use of eunoia is essential to understand the meaning of "ethos"
- an "ethos" is a common set of values
- thus the mode of persuasion of ethos must appeal to and reinforce the beliefs, character, and ideals of the audience
- it is from that commonality with the audience that the speaker earns credibility
- for Aristotle ethos consists of a speaker's
- phronesis = wisdom and good judgment
- arete = excellence or virtue
- eunoia = good will between the speaker and the audience
- accordingly, a speaker's credibility may be impugned (disputed) if
- speaker lacks expertise (i.e., speaker lacks authority, experience or knowledge to speak about the topic)
- speaker has a personal interest in the outcome of the debate (i.e., has a personal bias, thus lacks credibility)
- speaker has an ulterior motive in the outcome of the debate (i.e. has an additional reason for taking a position)
Logos[edit | edit source]
- reason
Pathos[edit | edit source]
- appeal to the emotions of an audience via
- sympathy (I feel bad for you) or empathy (I know how you feel)
the three Modes of Persuasion circularity[edit | edit source]
- while not explicit in Aristotle, we can see that each of the modes can be interconnected or self-referential to one another:
Multi-modal argument | Ethos | Logos | Pathos |
---|---|---|---|
A common or shared emotional experience w/ the audience ("I have suffered with you") | y | y | |
A common emotional experience that has a logical conclusion ("Starving babies is mean and also kills them") | y | y | |
A logical argument that leads to a common and/or emotional experience ("If we continue this madness, we will all die" | y | y | y |
Kairos[edit | edit source]
- a well-timed appeal that stays within the context of the moment
- kairos means "the right, critical, or opportune moment"
- arguing something at the right time
- keeping to the persuasive context
Rhetorical devices[edit | edit source]
- see above for Ethos, Logos and Pathos
- additional sections will cover rhetorical devices of counter-argument and repetition
- note
- some of these rhetorical devices may be used to create false or misleading arguments or logical fallacies, or to impugn (insult, insincerely attack) another person or position (ex. "ad hominem")
- many of these devices are also called "literary devices" and so are listed within that category, as well
- see Logical fallacies and Literary devices
ad hominem[edit | edit source]
- personal attack on the opponent as opposed to the opponent's argument
- can be a valid argument; see: Character Attacks: How to Properly Apply the Ad Hominem - Scientific American
alliteration[edit | edit source]
- repetition of sounds
- tightening tentacles terribly perturbs our tentative template
aporia[edit | edit source]
- expression of doubt
- when will this ever end, that is our problem
assonance[edit | edit source]
cacophony[edit | edit source]
- clashing sounds and words meant to convey tension or trouble
consonance[edit | edit source]
irony[edit | edit source]
Gish gallop[edit | edit source]
- rapid use of multiple arguments in order to overwhelm a debate or argument
- avoids scrutiny of individual arguments
- named for Duane Gish who spoke rapidly and without allowing the opponent to intervene or analyze each individual arguments
merism[edit | edit source]
- stating the extremes of something
- as in "from A to Z"
metanoia[edit | edit source]
- re-expressing a statement in a stronger or lesser way
- Her idea changed our country; indeed, it changed the world!
- metanoia means "a change of mind, a new way of seeing"
metonymy[edit | edit source]
- a reference to a person or thing though an office or attribute
- the White House (the president)
- my heart beats for you (love, care)
- those suits care only about themselves (corporate leaders)
onomatopoeia[edit | edit source]
- using words that sound like the mean
paralipsis[edit | edit source]
- see apophasis
personification[edit | edit source]
- giving human qualities to objects or ideas
trap question[edit | edit source]
- a syllogistic (logical) line of questions or thought that lead one's opponent to a logical conclusion in support of one's own argument
- particularly powerful in trials, whereby the witness is "trapped" into an admission of some fact
understatement[edit | edit source]
Rhetorical devices of counterarguments[edit | edit source]
diasyrmus[edit | edit source]
- a ridiculous comparison in order to dismiss a counter argument
derision[edit | edit source]
- ridicule or satire of an opposing argument
- You believe that? I have a bridge to sell you!
procatalepsis[edit | edit source]
- an argument that anticipates a possible objection
- then rebuts those objections
enthymeme[edit | edit source]
- an incomplete logical argument that begs the listener to fill in the answer or one that is already understood
- You can bet he'd never do that. Well, not if he's the kind of person he thinks himself to be.
hyperbole[edit | edit source]
- exaggeration for effect
hypophora[edit | edit source]
- ask a question, then proceed to answer it
Rhetorical devices of repetition[edit | edit source]
anadiplosis[edit | edit source]
- repeating a word or idea between sentence parts
- to each a duck, ducks for all!
- whosoever suffers it, suffers the most
anaphora[edit | edit source]
- repeating a word at the beginning of each clause, sentence or paragraph
- similar to epistrophe
- = repetition of a word or phrase at the end of a cause, sentence or paragraph
- symploce ("sim-ploh-see")
- = use of both anaphora and epistrophe
antanaclasis[edit | edit source]
- repeating a word without interruption
- yes, yes, yes
- why? why? why?
apophasis[edit | edit source]
- also called paralipsis
- author mentions an argument or fact in order to deny it or to deny using it
- also used to mention something indirectly
- = a form of irony
- may be seen as a "passive-aggressive" argument
- in that it states something while apologizing for having stated it
- may be seen as a "passive-aggressive" argument
- examples:
- "But we won't talk about my opponent's disastrous married life"
- "It would be a breach of decorum to mention base morals such as she embodies"
- actual use of paralipses:
- during Prohibition (when sale of alcohol was banned), a grape juice company included this paralipsis on its grape concentrate packaging:
- "After dissolving the brick in a gallon of water, do not place the liquid in a jug away in the cupboard for twenty days, because then it would turn into wine."
- during the 1984 presidential debates, Ronald Reagan, who was much older than his opponent, stated,
- "I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent's youth and inexperience."
- during Prohibition (when sale of alcohol was banned), a grape juice company included this paralipsis on its grape concentrate packaging:
Figurative or literary devices[edit | edit source]
- generally used for literary purposes and effects, these devices may also aid in the persuasive use of rhetoric