Rhetorical device: Difference between revisions

From A+ Club Lesson Planner & Study Guide
No edit summary
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
"'''rhetoric'''" = "the art of use of language for persuasion"
'''Rhetorical device / rhetorical devices''' = language or communication tools used for persuasion


* see page entry for [[Rhetoric]]
Rhetoric is the art of persuasion, a fundamental component of open, civil society and discourse. Where there is no persuasion, there is mere conformity or, worse, compulsion. Rhetoric underlies a free, democratic society.


== Rhetorical devices list ==
Rhetoric is more than a matter of speaking or writing <u>style</u>. It is a combination of 1) speaker & audience; 2) logic; 3) emotion = ''ethos, logos, pathos.'' Rhetoric moves ideas, is moved by ideas, and changes behaviors, beliefs, and actions.
 
== Definitions ==
 
=== rhetoric ===
 
* "the art of the use of language for persuasion"
 
=== rhetorical ===
 
* of or having to do with "rhetoric", which is "the art the use of language for persuasion"
 
=== device ===
 
* a technique or tool employed in
* thus, a technique for persuasion
 
=== rhetorical device ===
= techniques for persuasion
 
=== "rhetorical" in literary analysis ===
 
* note that in literature, "rhetoric" and "rhetorical"
 
see also: [[Rhetoric]] page entry
 
== Rhetoric ==
 
* "the art of persuasion"
* one of the three classical arts of discourse (see below)
* Aristotle defined rhetoric as
** "the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion."
* generally, rhetoric is the study of techniques to inform, persuade, or motivate (an audience)
* In the Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, Stephen Ziliak defines rhetoric as:
 
Rhetoric is employed in both act and perception, in private thought and public communication. It is a means of communication as well as a theory for understanding and criticizing itself and the alternative means of communication. (p. 237)
 
=== Trivium - "Three Arts of Discourse" ===
 
* "trivium" = "the place where three roads meet"
* [[wikipedia:Sister_Miriam_Joseph|Sister Miriam Joseph]]'s explanation of the Trivium:
** '''grammar''' for expression of thought
*** ''the thing as-it-is-symbolized''
**** symbols = letters and words
** '''logic''' for the art of thought
*** ''the thing as-it-is-known''
** '''rhetoric''' for communication
*** ''the thing as-it-is-communicated''
*** use of language and logic to persuade
* the trivium became the basis of the medieval "seven liberal arts"
** the trivium (3) and its extension in the "quadrivium" ("four ways") of astronomy, arithmetic (mathematics), geometry, and music
*** why arithmetic and geometry are distinct?
**** arithmetic or mathematics = pure numbers (i.e. conceptual)
**** geometry = number in space (i.e. distance, relation, etc.)
***** studies the properties of distance, size, shape and relative positions
 
==== Grammar ====
 
* the mechanics of language
** including the "law of identity"
*** that states "a horse is a horse, and not a man"
*** see Plato's [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-cratylus/ Cratylus]
 
==== Logic ====
 
* the mechanics of thought
** i.e., analysis, deduction, argument
* also, "dialectic"
** = refers to reasoned argumentation, usually between two or more people who debate or discuss a topic with the aim to establish a truth
 
==== Rhetoric ====
 
* application of language and logic for persuasion
* Aristotle saw rhetoric as
** "a combination of the science of logic and of the ethical branch of politics"
** thus it was designed for understanding, discovery and argumentation
** as both argumentation and ethics, rhetoric is truth-seeking
* the art of rhetoric was especially important to the ancient Greeks who developed democracy and civic participation
** rhetoric was a political tool and valued as an essential element of civic society
 
=== Aristotle's "Rhetoric" ===
 
* Aristotle = 4th Century B.C. Greek philosopher who deeply influenced Western thought
* his work, "Rhetoric" or "Art of Rhetoric" studied the art of persuasion
* in it, Aristotle clarified a center ground between the "sophists", who cared only for persuasion, regardless for truth, and Plato (and thus, Socrates) who focused on philosophy and absolute truths
** Plato felt that rhetoric was inherently deceptive, so only philosophy, which focused on discovering the truth
** Aristotle's insight was that rhetoric is a key tool for the discovery of truth
 
== Persuasion ==
 
* persuasion is the art of influencing another person's attitudes, behaviors, beliefs, choices, intentions or motivations
* persuasion is distinct from coercion
** as such, persuasion marks the fundamental distinguishing element in democratic as opposed to totalitarian society
** coercion is the use of violence, threats of violence, or some form of repercussion in order to control or shape behavior, beliefs, or ideas
** forms of changing belief that are coercive include (and thus are not persuasion)
*** indoctrination
*** brainwashing
*** propagandism
*** censorship
* persuasion requires
** reciprocity
*** as Stephen Ziliak notes, "rhetoric judges and is judged, it moves and is moved."
** honesty
*** which is why Aristotle was so concerned about "ethics"
** logic
** language
* forms of persuasion
** logic
** rhetorical devices (see below)
** heuristics
*** problem solving or argumentation that is not precise but yields an approximate truth or reality
*** heuristics are rational but not perfectly logical
*** includes:
**** educated guess
**** trial and error
**** applied experience (things turn out as expected from prior experience)
 
== Aristotle's Modes of Persuasion ==
 
* the commonly referred to modes of persuasion are '''''ethos, logos''''' and '''''pathos'''''
* Aristotle also discussed a fourth mode of persuasion, '''''kairos''''' (see below)
* Aristotle distinguished types of <u>persuasive situations</u>, including
** '''''epideictic''''' = ceremonial speeches (praise or condemnation)
** '''''forensic''''' = judicial, especially for establishing guilt or innocence
** '''''deliberative''''' = persuasion of an audience on an issue or idea
*** the purpose of deliberative rhetoric was to pursue the '''''koinon''','' or common, or greater, good
*** deliberative rhetoric was to be used in the four '''''politeia''''', democracy, oligarchy, aristocracy and monarchy
* and he distinguished two types of "rhetorical proofs"
** proof = a logical argument that is sufficient to establish a truth
** '''''enthymeme''''' = proof by logic (syllogism, or deductive reasoning)
*** i.e., if A= B, and B=C, then A=C
** '''''paradeigma''''' = proof by example
*** in order to establish a general rule
* he argued that philosophy is too narrow a discipline for practical purposes
** while philosophy is useful for reasoning to a scientific (knowledgeable) certainty or truth
** rhetoric has a larger, practical role in human affairs
* In ''Rhetoric'', Aristotle outlined three main categories of persuasive techniques to employ upon an audience
** (note that the appeal must have an audience!)
** ''ethos, logos'' & ''pathos''
* Aristotle agrees with Plato that persuasion can be deceptive and abusive,
** thus while employing "pathos" (passion, emotion), a speaker must also exhibit "ethos" (see below)
 
=== Ethos ===
 
* ethical appeal to establish speaker's credibility and character
** most commonly taught in high school as "appeal to authority" or the "credibility" of the speaker
** wherein the speaker establishes expertise, knowledge, authority or credibility
* however, Aristotle's use of '''''eunoia''''' is essential to understand the meaning of "ethos"
** an "ethos" is a common set of values
** thus the mode of persuasion of ethos must appeal to and reinforce the beliefs, character, and ideals of the audience
*** it is from that commonality with the audience that the speaker earns credibility
* for Aristotle ethos consists of a speaker's
** '''''phronesis''''' = wisdom and good judgment
** '''''arete''''' = excellence or virtue
** '''''eunoia''''' = good will between the speaker and the audience
* accordingly, a speaker's credibility may be impugned (disputed) if
** speaker lacks expertise (i.e., speaker lacks authority, experience or knowledge to speak about the topic)
** speaker has a personal interest in the outcome of the debate (i.e., has a personal bias, thus lacks credibility)
** speaker has an ulterior motive in the outcome of the debate (i.e. has an additional reason for taking a position)
 
=== Logos ===
 
* reason
 
=== Pathos ===
 
* appeal to the emotions of an audience via
** sympathy (''I feel bad for you'') or empathy (''I know how you feel'')
 
=== the three Modes of Persuasion circularity ===
 
* while not explicit in Aristotle, we can see that each of the modes can be interconnected or self-referential to one another:
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+Reinforced or Dual Modes of Persuasion
!Multi-modal argument
!Ethos
!Logos
!Pathos
|-
|A common or shared emotional experience w/ the audience ("I have suffered with you")
|''y''
|
|''y''
|-
|A common emotional experience that has a logical conclusion ("Starving babies is mean and also kills them")
|
|''y''
|''y''
|-
|A logical argument that leads to a common and/or emotional experience ("If we continue this madness, we will all die"
|''y''
|''y''
|''y''
|}
 
=== Kairos ===
 
* a well-timed appeal that stays within the context of the moment
* ''kairos'' means "the right, critical, or opportune moment"
** arguing something at the right time
** keeping to the persuasive context
 
== Rhetorical devices ==
 
* see above for Ethos, Logos and Pathos
* additional sections will cover rhetorical devices of counter-argument and repetition
* note
** some of these rhetorical devices may be used to create false or misleading arguments or logical fallacies, or to impugn (insult, insincerely attack) another person or position (ex. "ad hominem")
** many of these devices are also called "literary devices" and so are listed within that category, as well
** see [[Logical fallacy|Logical fallacies]] and [[Literary devices]]


=== ad hominem ===
=== ad hominem ===


=== apophasis ===
* personal attack on the opponent as opposed to the opponent's argument
* can be a valid argument; see: [https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/character-attack/ Character Attacks: How to Properly Apply the Ad Hominem - Scientific American]


* also called "'''Paralipsis'''"
=== alliteration ===
 
* repetition of sounds
** ''tightening tentacles terribly perturbs our tentative template''
 
=== aporia ===
 
* expression of doubt
** ''when will this ever end, that is our problem''
 
=== assonance ===
 
=== cacophony ===
 
* clashing sounds and words meant to convey tension or trouble
 
=== consonance ===
 
=== irony ===
 
=== Gish gallop ===
* rapid use of multiple arguments in order to overwhelm a debate or argument
** avoids scrutiny of individual arguments
** named for Duane Gish who spoke rapidly and without allowing the opponent to intervene or analyze each individual arguments
 
=== merism ===
 
* stating the extremes of something
** as in "from A to Z"
 
=== metanoia ===
* re-expressing a statement in a stronger or lesser way
** ''Her idea changed our country; indeed, it changed the world!''
* ''metanoia'' means "a change of mind, a new way of seeing"
 
=== metonymy ===
 
* a reference to a person or thing though an office or attribute
** ''the White House'' (the president)
** ''my heart beats for you'' (love, care)
** ''those suits care only about themselves'' (corporate leaders)
 
=== onomatopoeia ===
 
* using words that sound like the mean
 
=== paralipsis ===
 
* see apophasis
 
=== personification ===
 
* giving human qualities to objects or ideas
 
=== trap question ===
 
* a syllogistic (logical) line of questions or thought that lead one's opponent to a logical conclusion in support of one's own argument
* particularly powerful in trials, whereby the witness is "trapped" into an admission of some fact
 
=== understatement ===
 
== Rhetorical devices of counterarguments ==
 
==== diasyrmus ====
 
* a ridiculous comparison in order to dismiss a counter argument
 
==== derision ====
 
* ridicule or satire of an opposing argument
** ''You believe that? I have a bridge to sell you!''
 
==== procatalepsis ====
 
* an argument that anticipates a possible objection
* then rebuts those objections
 
=== enthymeme ===
 
* an incomplete logical argument that begs the listener to fill in the answer or one that is already understood
** ''You can bet he'd never do that. Well, not if he's the kind of person he thinks himself to be.''
 
=== hyperbole ===
 
* exaggeration for effect
 
=== hypophora ===
 
* ask a question, then proceed to answer it
 
== Rhetorical devices of repetition ==
 
==== anadiplosis ====
 
* repeating a word or idea between sentence parts
** ''to each a duck, ducks for all!''
** ''whosoever suffers it, suffers the most''
 
==== anaphora ====
 
* repeating a word at the beginning of each clause, sentence or paragraph
* similar to '''epistrophe'''
** = repetition of a word or phrase at the end of a cause, sentence or paragraph
* '''symploce''' ("sim-ploh-see")
** = use of both anaphora and epistrophe
 
==== antanaclasis ====
 
* repeating a word without interruption
** ''yes, yes, yes''
** ''why? why? why?''
 
==== apophasis ====
* also called '''paralipsis'''
* author mentions an argument or fact in order to deny it or to deny using it
* author mentions an argument or fact in order to deny it or to deny using it
* also used to mention something indirectly
* also used to mention something indirectly
Line 26: Line 350:
* see [[wikipedia:Apophasis|Apophasis - Wikipedia]]
* see [[wikipedia:Apophasis|Apophasis - Wikipedia]]


=== paralipsis ===
== Figurative or literary devices ==
 
* generally used for literary purposes and effects, these devices may also aid in the persuasive use of rhetoric
 
=== imagery ===


* see Apophasis
=== metaphor ===


=== simile ===
[[Category:Rhetoric]]
[[Category:Rhetoric]]
[[Category:Language Arts]]
[[Category:Language Arts]]
[[Category:Philosophy]]

Latest revision as of 02:08, 9 June 2024

Rhetorical device / rhetorical devices = language or communication tools used for persuasion

Rhetoric is the art of persuasion, a fundamental component of open, civil society and discourse. Where there is no persuasion, there is mere conformity or, worse, compulsion. Rhetoric underlies a free, democratic society.

Rhetoric is more than a matter of speaking or writing style. It is a combination of 1) speaker & audience; 2) logic; 3) emotion = ethos, logos, pathos. Rhetoric moves ideas, is moved by ideas, and changes behaviors, beliefs, and actions.

Definitions[edit | edit source]

rhetoric[edit | edit source]

  • "the art of the use of language for persuasion"

rhetorical[edit | edit source]

  • of or having to do with "rhetoric", which is "the art the use of language for persuasion"

device[edit | edit source]

  • a technique or tool employed in
  • thus, a technique for persuasion

rhetorical device[edit | edit source]

= techniques for persuasion

"rhetorical" in literary analysis[edit | edit source]

  • note that in literature, "rhetoric" and "rhetorical"

see also: Rhetoric page entry

Rhetoric[edit | edit source]

  • "the art of persuasion"
  • one of the three classical arts of discourse (see below)
  • Aristotle defined rhetoric as
    • "the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion."
  • generally, rhetoric is the study of techniques to inform, persuade, or motivate (an audience)
  • In the Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, Stephen Ziliak defines rhetoric as:
Rhetoric is employed in both act and perception, in private thought and public communication. It is a means of communication as well as a theory for understanding and criticizing itself and the alternative means of communication. (p. 237)

Trivium - "Three Arts of Discourse"[edit | edit source]

  • "trivium" = "the place where three roads meet"
  • Sister Miriam Joseph's explanation of the Trivium:
    • grammar for expression of thought
      • the thing as-it-is-symbolized
        • symbols = letters and words
    • logic for the art of thought
      • the thing as-it-is-known
    • rhetoric for communication
      • the thing as-it-is-communicated
      • use of language and logic to persuade
  • the trivium became the basis of the medieval "seven liberal arts"
    • the trivium (3) and its extension in the "quadrivium" ("four ways") of astronomy, arithmetic (mathematics), geometry, and music
      • why arithmetic and geometry are distinct?
        • arithmetic or mathematics = pure numbers (i.e. conceptual)
        • geometry = number in space (i.e. distance, relation, etc.)
          • studies the properties of distance, size, shape and relative positions

Grammar[edit | edit source]

  • the mechanics of language
    • including the "law of identity"
      • that states "a horse is a horse, and not a man"
      • see Plato's Cratylus

Logic[edit | edit source]

  • the mechanics of thought
    • i.e., analysis, deduction, argument
  • also, "dialectic"
    • = refers to reasoned argumentation, usually between two or more people who debate or discuss a topic with the aim to establish a truth

Rhetoric[edit | edit source]

  • application of language and logic for persuasion
  • Aristotle saw rhetoric as
    • "a combination of the science of logic and of the ethical branch of politics"
    • thus it was designed for understanding, discovery and argumentation
    • as both argumentation and ethics, rhetoric is truth-seeking
  • the art of rhetoric was especially important to the ancient Greeks who developed democracy and civic participation
    • rhetoric was a political tool and valued as an essential element of civic society

Aristotle's "Rhetoric"[edit | edit source]

  • Aristotle = 4th Century B.C. Greek philosopher who deeply influenced Western thought
  • his work, "Rhetoric" or "Art of Rhetoric" studied the art of persuasion
  • in it, Aristotle clarified a center ground between the "sophists", who cared only for persuasion, regardless for truth, and Plato (and thus, Socrates) who focused on philosophy and absolute truths
    • Plato felt that rhetoric was inherently deceptive, so only philosophy, which focused on discovering the truth
    • Aristotle's insight was that rhetoric is a key tool for the discovery of truth

Persuasion[edit | edit source]

  • persuasion is the art of influencing another person's attitudes, behaviors, beliefs, choices, intentions or motivations
  • persuasion is distinct from coercion
    • as such, persuasion marks the fundamental distinguishing element in democratic as opposed to totalitarian society
    • coercion is the use of violence, threats of violence, or some form of repercussion in order to control or shape behavior, beliefs, or ideas
    • forms of changing belief that are coercive include (and thus are not persuasion)
      • indoctrination
      • brainwashing
      • propagandism
      • censorship
  • persuasion requires
    • reciprocity
      • as Stephen Ziliak notes, "rhetoric judges and is judged, it moves and is moved."
    • honesty
      • which is why Aristotle was so concerned about "ethics"
    • logic
    • language
  • forms of persuasion
    • logic
    • rhetorical devices (see below)
    • heuristics
      • problem solving or argumentation that is not precise but yields an approximate truth or reality
      • heuristics are rational but not perfectly logical
      • includes:
        • educated guess
        • trial and error
        • applied experience (things turn out as expected from prior experience)

Aristotle's Modes of Persuasion[edit | edit source]

  • the commonly referred to modes of persuasion are ethos, logos and pathos
  • Aristotle also discussed a fourth mode of persuasion, kairos (see below)
  • Aristotle distinguished types of persuasive situations, including
    • epideictic = ceremonial speeches (praise or condemnation)
    • forensic = judicial, especially for establishing guilt or innocence
    • deliberative = persuasion of an audience on an issue or idea
      • the purpose of deliberative rhetoric was to pursue the koinon, or common, or greater, good
      • deliberative rhetoric was to be used in the four politeia, democracy, oligarchy, aristocracy and monarchy
  • and he distinguished two types of "rhetorical proofs"
    • proof = a logical argument that is sufficient to establish a truth
    • enthymeme = proof by logic (syllogism, or deductive reasoning)
      • i.e., if A= B, and B=C, then A=C
    • paradeigma = proof by example
      • in order to establish a general rule
  • he argued that philosophy is too narrow a discipline for practical purposes
    • while philosophy is useful for reasoning to a scientific (knowledgeable) certainty or truth
    • rhetoric has a larger, practical role in human affairs
  • In Rhetoric, Aristotle outlined three main categories of persuasive techniques to employ upon an audience
    • (note that the appeal must have an audience!)
    • ethos, logos & pathos
  • Aristotle agrees with Plato that persuasion can be deceptive and abusive,
    • thus while employing "pathos" (passion, emotion), a speaker must also exhibit "ethos" (see below)

Ethos[edit | edit source]

  • ethical appeal to establish speaker's credibility and character
    • most commonly taught in high school as "appeal to authority" or the "credibility" of the speaker
    • wherein the speaker establishes expertise, knowledge, authority or credibility
  • however, Aristotle's use of eunoia is essential to understand the meaning of "ethos"
    • an "ethos" is a common set of values
    • thus the mode of persuasion of ethos must appeal to and reinforce the beliefs, character, and ideals of the audience
      • it is from that commonality with the audience that the speaker earns credibility
  • for Aristotle ethos consists of a speaker's
    • phronesis = wisdom and good judgment
    • arete = excellence or virtue
    • eunoia = good will between the speaker and the audience
  • accordingly, a speaker's credibility may be impugned (disputed) if
    • speaker lacks expertise (i.e., speaker lacks authority, experience or knowledge to speak about the topic)
    • speaker has a personal interest in the outcome of the debate (i.e., has a personal bias, thus lacks credibility)
    • speaker has an ulterior motive in the outcome of the debate (i.e. has an additional reason for taking a position)

Logos[edit | edit source]

  • reason

Pathos[edit | edit source]

  • appeal to the emotions of an audience via
    • sympathy (I feel bad for you) or empathy (I know how you feel)

the three Modes of Persuasion circularity[edit | edit source]

  • while not explicit in Aristotle, we can see that each of the modes can be interconnected or self-referential to one another:
Reinforced or Dual Modes of Persuasion
Multi-modal argument Ethos Logos Pathos
A common or shared emotional experience w/ the audience ("I have suffered with you") y y
A common emotional experience that has a logical conclusion ("Starving babies is mean and also kills them") y y
A logical argument that leads to a common and/or emotional experience ("If we continue this madness, we will all die" y y y

Kairos[edit | edit source]

  • a well-timed appeal that stays within the context of the moment
  • kairos means "the right, critical, or opportune moment"
    • arguing something at the right time
    • keeping to the persuasive context

Rhetorical devices[edit | edit source]

  • see above for Ethos, Logos and Pathos
  • additional sections will cover rhetorical devices of counter-argument and repetition
  • note
    • some of these rhetorical devices may be used to create false or misleading arguments or logical fallacies, or to impugn (insult, insincerely attack) another person or position (ex. "ad hominem")
    • many of these devices are also called "literary devices" and so are listed within that category, as well
    • see Logical fallacies and Literary devices

ad hominem[edit | edit source]

alliteration[edit | edit source]

  • repetition of sounds
    • tightening tentacles terribly perturbs our tentative template

aporia[edit | edit source]

  • expression of doubt
    • when will this ever end, that is our problem

assonance[edit | edit source]

cacophony[edit | edit source]

  • clashing sounds and words meant to convey tension or trouble

consonance[edit | edit source]

irony[edit | edit source]

Gish gallop[edit | edit source]

  • rapid use of multiple arguments in order to overwhelm a debate or argument
    • avoids scrutiny of individual arguments
    • named for Duane Gish who spoke rapidly and without allowing the opponent to intervene or analyze each individual arguments

merism[edit | edit source]

  • stating the extremes of something
    • as in "from A to Z"

metanoia[edit | edit source]

  • re-expressing a statement in a stronger or lesser way
    • Her idea changed our country; indeed, it changed the world!
  • metanoia means "a change of mind, a new way of seeing"

metonymy[edit | edit source]

  • a reference to a person or thing though an office or attribute
    • the White House (the president)
    • my heart beats for you (love, care)
    • those suits care only about themselves (corporate leaders)

onomatopoeia[edit | edit source]

  • using words that sound like the mean

paralipsis[edit | edit source]

  • see apophasis

personification[edit | edit source]

  • giving human qualities to objects or ideas

trap question[edit | edit source]

  • a syllogistic (logical) line of questions or thought that lead one's opponent to a logical conclusion in support of one's own argument
  • particularly powerful in trials, whereby the witness is "trapped" into an admission of some fact

understatement[edit | edit source]

Rhetorical devices of counterarguments[edit | edit source]

diasyrmus[edit | edit source]

  • a ridiculous comparison in order to dismiss a counter argument

derision[edit | edit source]

  • ridicule or satire of an opposing argument
    • You believe that? I have a bridge to sell you!

procatalepsis[edit | edit source]

  • an argument that anticipates a possible objection
  • then rebuts those objections

enthymeme[edit | edit source]

  • an incomplete logical argument that begs the listener to fill in the answer or one that is already understood
    • You can bet he'd never do that. Well, not if he's the kind of person he thinks himself to be.

hyperbole[edit | edit source]

  • exaggeration for effect

hypophora[edit | edit source]

  • ask a question, then proceed to answer it

Rhetorical devices of repetition[edit | edit source]

anadiplosis[edit | edit source]

  • repeating a word or idea between sentence parts
    • to each a duck, ducks for all!
    • whosoever suffers it, suffers the most

anaphora[edit | edit source]

  • repeating a word at the beginning of each clause, sentence or paragraph
  • similar to epistrophe
    • = repetition of a word or phrase at the end of a cause, sentence or paragraph
  • symploce ("sim-ploh-see")
    • = use of both anaphora and epistrophe

antanaclasis[edit | edit source]

  • repeating a word without interruption
    • yes, yes, yes
    • why? why? why?

apophasis[edit | edit source]

  • also called paralipsis
  • author mentions an argument or fact in order to deny it or to deny using it
  • also used to mention something indirectly
  • = a form of irony
    • may be seen as a "passive-aggressive" argument
      • in that it states something while apologizing for having stated it
  • examples:
    • "But we won't talk about my opponent's disastrous married life"
    • "It would be a breach of decorum to mention base morals such as she embodies"
  • actual use of paralipses:
    • during Prohibition (when sale of alcohol was banned), a grape juice company included this paralipsis on its grape concentrate packaging:
      • "After dissolving the brick in a gallon of water, do not place the liquid in a jug away in the cupboard for twenty days, because then it would turn into wine."
    • during the 1984 presidential debates, Ronald Reagan, who was much older than his opponent, stated,
      • "I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent's youth and inexperience."

Figurative or literary devices[edit | edit source]

  • generally used for literary purposes and effects, these devices may also aid in the persuasive use of rhetoric

imagery[edit | edit source]

metaphor[edit | edit source]

simile[edit | edit source]