Logical fallacy: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* misleading = deliberately constructed to deceive or mislead | * misleading = deliberately constructed to deceive or mislead | ||
See [[ | See [[Social_Studies_skills#Logical_and_observational_fallacies_&_paradoxes|Social Studies skills: Logical and observational fallacies & paradoxes]] for list of logical and observational fallacies regarding the Social Sciences. | ||
==Logical fallacies and tricks== | ==Logical fallacies and tricks== |
Revision as of 03:38, 21 January 2023
Logical fallacies are erroneous, illogical, or misleading arguments or claims
- erroneous = contains an error of fact or
- illogical = draws a conclusion not supported by premises
- misleading = deliberately constructed to deceive or mislead
See Social Studies skills: Logical and observational fallacies & paradoxes for list of logical and observational fallacies regarding the Social Sciences.
Logical fallacies and tricks[edit | edit source]
- begging the question
- broken leg fallacy
- presents a solution for a problem caused by that or a related solution
- i.e, break the leg, then offer to fix it
- confusing credentials for evidence
- i.e., "98% of dentists recommend flossing"
- does not provide evidence for the benefits of flossing, just that supposed experts say so
- i.e., "98% of dentists recommend flossing"
- fallacy of relevance
- ignoratio elenchi an argument that misses the point
- non sequitur
- " Humpty Dumptying" or "Humpty Dumptyisms":
- = an "arbitrary redefinition" like that used by Humpty Dumpty in "Alice in Wonderland"
- who tells Alice, "“When I use a word it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
- red herring
- strawman fallacy
- = the target of an argument (the "strawman") has nothing to do with the actual argument
- either-or fallacy
- incorrectly argues only two options or possibilities
- see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
See also