Template:Consecutive nouns as multiple objects: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* nouns can act as multiple objects of a verb | * consecutive nouns can act as multiple objects of a verb | ||
* ex. | ** i.e., two nouns next to one another | ||
** | ** as in "I gave the boy a donut" | ||
* when the action has a direct and indirect object, the indirect object is often preceded by "to" in order to indicate the direct object | |||
** however, we frequently drop the "to", which remains implied in the sentence | |||
*** so instead of "I gave a donut to the boy" we simply say, "I gave the boy a donut" | |||
** another ex. "She gave the man grief" | |||
*** can also be expressed as "She gave grief to the man" | |||
*** the noun "grief" is what was given (direct object) and the noun "man" is to whom the grief was given (indirect object) | |||
Click expand for an example of multiple nouns as objects from [https://collegereadiness.collegeboard.org/pdf/sat-practice-test-10.pdf CB Writing practice test 10, question 36]: | Click expand for an example of multiple nouns as objects from [https://collegereadiness.collegeboard.org/pdf/sat-practice-test-10.pdf CB Writing practice test 10, question 36]: | ||
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"> | <div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"> | ||
| Line 12: | Line 18: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
* elimination | * elimination | ||
** x A) "workers'" | ** x A) the possessive "worker's" confuses the direct object "opportunities" with the indirect object "workers"; in other words, "employers" don't offer "workers" they offer "opportunities" | ||
** x B) and x D) the noun "opportunities" cannot possess the preposition "for" | ** x B) and x D) the noun "opportunities" cannot possess the preposition "for" | ||
* Correct answer C) = | * Correct answer C) = SUBJECT: employers VERB: offer INDIRECT OBJECT: workers DIRECT OBJECT: opportunities | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:58, 30 July 2021
- consecutive nouns can act as multiple objects of a verb
- i.e., two nouns next to one another
- as in "I gave the boy a donut"
- when the action has a direct and indirect object, the indirect object is often preceded by "to" in order to indicate the direct object
- however, we frequently drop the "to", which remains implied in the sentence
- so instead of "I gave a donut to the boy" we simply say, "I gave the boy a donut"
- another ex. "She gave the man grief"
- can also be expressed as "She gave grief to the man"
- the noun "grief" is what was given (direct object) and the noun "man" is to whom the grief was given (indirect object)
- however, we frequently drop the "to", which remains implied in the sentence
Click expand for an example of multiple nouns as objects from CB Writing practice test 10, question 36:
Tuition-reimbursement programs signal that employers offer their [36] [workers’ opportunities] for personal and professional development. A) worker's opportunities [NO CHANGE] B) workers opportunities’ C) workers opportunities D) worker’s opportunity’s
- elimination
- x A) the possessive "worker's" confuses the direct object "opportunities" with the indirect object "workers"; in other words, "employers" don't offer "workers" they offer "opportunities"
- x B) and x D) the noun "opportunities" cannot possess the preposition "for"
- Correct answer C) = SUBJECT: employers VERB: offer INDIRECT OBJECT: workers DIRECT OBJECT: opportunities