SAT Writing section techniques, strategies & approaches: Difference between revisions

Line 411: Line 411:
** proper nouns are capitalized
** proper nouns are capitalized


=== noun modifying another noun ===
=== noun modifying another noun (attributive noun) ===
{{Noun as modifier}}
{{Noun as modifier}}
* SAT Writing test questions on attributive nouns:
* SAT Writing test questions on attributive nouns:
Line 425: Line 425:
D) officials are taking away students'
D) officials are taking away students'
</pre>
</pre>
* elimination
* elimination:
** x A) the noun "official's" incorrectly possesses the verb "are" (see possessive nouns for more)
** x A) the noun "official's" incorrectly possesses the verb "are" (see possessive nouns for more)
** x B) "students choice" = an incorrect plural form of the attributive noun "student" (student choice = the kind of choice for students)
** x B) "students choice" = an incorrect plural form of the attributive noun "student" (student choice = the kind of choice for students)
* we now have the distinction between C) student's (singular possessive) D) students' (plural possessive)
* we now have the distinction between C) student's (singular possessive) D) students' (plural possessive)
** thus we match the correct D) students' to "By requiring students" from the sentence
** thus we match the correct D) students' to "By requiring students" from the sentence
</div>
* note that when two nouns are next to one another without apostrophes (possessive forms), it is not necessarily an attributive noun
** it could also be two nouns juxtaposed as direct and indirect objects
click EXPAND for an example of how two nouns next to one as direct and indirect objects not possessive or attributive nouns [[https://collegereadiness.collegeboard.org/pdf/sat-practice-test-10.pdf CB Writing practice test 10, question 36]]:
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">
<pre>Tuition-reimbursement programs signal that employers offer their [36] [workers' opportunities] for personal and professional development. </pre>
A) workers' opportunities [NO CHANGE]
B) workers opportunities'
C) workers opportunities
D) workers' opportunity's
* elimination:
** x B) workers opportunities' << "opportunity's" cannot possess the next word, "for" (a preposition); nouns can only possess nouns, so eliminate
** x D) workers' opportunity's << same as B)
* we now have either "worker's opportunities" or "workers opportunities"
** in context, do the "workers" possess "opportunities"
*** reading the sentence, we see that the core SV of the sentence is: "programs offer"
*** the verb "offer" requires an object: what does it offer? = "opportunities" = the direct object of the verb "offer"
*** then we see that "programs offer opportunities" to whom? = "workers" = the indirect object of "offer"
*** therefore we eliminate A) because "workers" do not possess "opportunities", they are being "offered them," so C)
</div>
</div>