4,620
edits
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
|} | |} | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
* click EXPAND to see table | * '''click EXPAND to see table''' | ||
* NOW read the sentences | * NOW read the sentences | ||
** don't summarize, simplify (to avoid misconstruing the meanings) | ** don't summarize, simplify (to avoid misconstruing the meanings) | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
|gives example '''NO'''|| | |gives example '''NO'''|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
|compares'''NO'''|| | |compares '''NO'''|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| draws a conclusion from '''NO''' || | | draws a conclusion from '''NO''' || | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
|} | |} | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
* click on EXPAND to see the anticipation | * '''click on EXPAND to see the anticipation''' | ||
** NOW eliminate | ** NOW eliminate | ||
*** A ) NO | *** A) For example, << NO bc Sentence 2 does not give an example of Sentence 1 | ||
*** B) Similarly, | *** B) Similarly, << NO bc Sentence 2 does not make a comparison to Sentence 1 | ||
*** C) However, | *** C) However, << NO bc Sentence 2 does not draw an opposite | ||
*** D) Subsequently, | *** D) Subsequently, << YES bc Sentence logically follows chronologically Sentence 1 |