4,619
edits
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* misleading = deliberately constructed to deceive or mislead | * misleading = deliberately constructed to deceive or mislead | ||
See [[Social_Studies_skills#Logical_and_observational_fallacies_&_paradoxes|Social Studies skills: Logical and observational fallacies & paradoxes]] for list of logical and observational fallacies regarding the Social Sciences. | See [[Social_Studies_skills#Logical_and_observational_fallacies_&_paradoxes|Social Studies skills: Logical and observational fallacies & paradoxes]] for list of logical and observational fallacies regarding the Social Sciences. | ||
'''<big>Introduction</big>''' | |||
* as an independent study, logic is not taught in secondary schools | |||
** nevertheless, it is used in all disciplines | |||
** math equations are logic-based | |||
** social students arguments are logic-based | |||
** literary comprehension and analysis employs logic | |||
* it is less important for students to learn the names of the fallacies (which is useful) than to recognize when a logical fallacy is used. | |||
* therefore, | |||
** the first chapter below categorizes logical and rhetorical fallacies, then identifies the name | |||
** the subsequent chapters is alphabetical list of logical and rhetorical fallacies and their definitions | |||
== Logical and Rhetorical strategies & the logical fallacy it represents == | |||
* "Rhetorical strategy" = a technique for presenting an argument, not the argument itself | |||
** i.e., the word choice and structure, presentation technique, etc. | |||
* "Logical strategy" = the actual argument and how it is structured | |||
* "Logical fallacy it represents" = the term and definition of the rhetorical or logical strategy employed | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+ | |||
!Rhetorical strategy | |||
!Logical strategy | |||
!Logical Fallacy it represents | |||
!Definition | |||
|- | |||
|Accuse opponent of bad character or moral shortcoming | |||
Insults such as ''inhumane, Communist, Nazi, bigoted, sociopathic'', etc., or even milder flaws such as ''insensitivity, selfishness'', etc. | |||
| | |||
|''ad hominem'' | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Only allows for two sides to an argument, or giving only two options, such as yes or no and no in between | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Ask a question that assumes an answer | |||
| | |||
|rhetorical question | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Offer only two alternatives (either this or that) | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|} | |||
==Logical fallacies== | ==Logical fallacies== | ||
Line 48: | Line 101: | ||
*<u>fallacy</u>: illogically confines or limits the argument | *<u>fallacy</u>: illogically confines or limits the argument | ||
===fallacy of relevance=== | ===fallacy of relevance=== | ||
=== false dilemma === | |||
* similar to "either/or" fallacy | |||
* limits the argument to certain premises | |||
** thereby denying other possible premises or explanations for an argument | |||
* = a type of "[[wikipedia:Disjunction|disjunctive claim]]" | |||
===false equivalence=== | ===false equivalence=== | ||
*illogical comparison of dissimilar subjects | *illogical comparison of dissimilar subjects |