Landmark Supreme Court cases: Difference between revisions

Line 6: Line 6:
* cases as generally recommended for core study for the AP Gov exam
* cases as generally recommended for core study for the AP Gov exam
* review of additional cases will yield greater student comprehension and analysis  
* review of additional cases will yield greater student comprehension and analysis  
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+
|+
!Case
!Case
Line 160: Line 160:
*
*
|-
|-
|New York Times v. United States
|'''New York Times v. United States'''
|1971
|1971
|Burger
|Burger
Line 176: Line 176:
|
|
|-
|-
|Roe v. Wade
|'''Roe v. Wade'''
|1973
|1973
|Burger
|Burger
Line 195: Line 195:
* Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (pending as of April 2022)
* Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (pending as of April 2022)
|-
|-
|Schenck v. United States
|'''Schenck v. United States'''
|1919
|1919
|Hughes
|Hughes
Line 211: Line 211:
* [[wikipedia:Brandenburg_v._Ohio|Brandenburg v. Ohio]] (1969: partially overturned Schenck by creating the "imminent lawless action" standard that was stricter than the "clear and present danger" test)
* [[wikipedia:Brandenburg_v._Ohio|Brandenburg v. Ohio]] (1969: partially overturned Schenck by creating the "imminent lawless action" standard that was stricter than the "clear and present danger" test)
|-
|-
|Shaw v. Reno
|'''Shaw v. Reno'''
|1993
|1993
|Rehnquist
|Rehnquist
Line 225: Line 225:
* Miller v. Johnson (1995: addressed racial gerrymandering that had created a "geographic monstrosity" in order to have a black-majority of voters)
* Miller v. Johnson (1995: addressed racial gerrymandering that had created a "geographic monstrosity" in order to have a black-majority of voters)
|-
|-
|Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
|'''Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District'''
|1969
|1969
|Warren
|Warren
Line 245: Line 245:
* [[wikipedia:Miller_v._California|Miller v. California]] (1973: created the "Miller Test" for obscene materials, which may be legally banned)
* [[wikipedia:Miller_v._California|Miller v. California]] (1973: created the "Miller Test" for obscene materials, which may be legally banned)
|-
|-
|United States v. Lopez
|'''United States v. Lopez'''
|1995
|1995
|Rehnquist
|Rehnquist
Line 264: Line 264:
* [[wikipedia:United_States_v._Morrison|United States v. Morrison]] (2000: similarly ruled that an act of Congress exceeded the powers granted Congress by the Commerce clause, in this case because the part of the law that the Court struck down was not directly related to economic activity)
* [[wikipedia:United_States_v._Morrison|United States v. Morrison]] (2000: similarly ruled that an act of Congress exceeded the powers granted Congress by the Commerce clause, in this case because the part of the law that the Court struck down was not directly related to economic activity)
|-
|-
|Wisconsin v. Yoder
|'''Wisconsin v. Yoder'''
|1972
|1972
|Burger
|Burger