Economics: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(→Useful Economic vocabulary, models & theories: adding labor) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* Substitute good | * Substitute good | ||
=== | === labor === | ||
* division of labor | |||
* flexibility of labor | |||
=== externalities === | |||
* = impacts or consequences upon others (external) | * = impacts or consequences upon others (external) | ||
* externalities have an inherent duality | * externalities have an inherent duality |
Revision as of 13:22, 11 September 2021
Economics
- See also [Social Studies Skills|Social Studies Skills]
[Category:Social Studies]
Economics point of view
Economists look at human relations and outcomes through certain lenses, including:[edit | edit source]
- values & exchange
- utility
- incentives
- impacts
Useful Economic vocabulary, models & theories[edit | edit source]
Cost[edit | edit source]
- sunk cost
goods[edit | edit source]
- Complement good
- Coordination good
- Free goods
- Inferior goods
- Normal goods
- Public good
- services available to all that have no competition, such as utilities
- use of a public good by one person does not reduce its availability to another
- services available to all that have no competition, such as utilities
- Substitute good
labor[edit | edit source]
- division of labor
- flexibility of labor
externalities[edit | edit source]
- = impacts or consequences upon others (external)
- externalities have an inherent duality
- the external actors must be present for the external impact
- i.e., if nobody lives near the factory, its noise won't bother anyone
- the noise is an externality only because people can hear it
- however, those people living near it may have a benefit that is greater than the externality
- such as jobs, whatever the factory is making, etc.
- i.e., if nobody lives near the factory, its noise won't bother anyone
- from economist Cose
- the external actors must be present for the external impact
Opportunity cost[edit | edit source]
Prisoner's Dilemma[edit | edit source]
- the "prisoner's dilemma" represents a clash of individual versus group interests
- "dilemma" = a problem for which the solutions all reach a negative outcome
- as opposed to a "paradox"
- which is a problem that has no solution, the solution is never-ending, or the solution yields an outcome that negates the original problem
- as opposed to a "paradox"
- "dilemma" = a problem for which the solutions all reach a negative outcome
- in the prisoner's dilemma, two prisoners must select between 1) confess to the crime or 2) remain silent
- each is held separately and does not know what the other will choose
- Option 1 choices:
- Prisoner 1 (P1) confesses
- Prisoner 2 (P2) remains silent
- outcome: P1 goes free & P2 serves the worst jail sentence with no chance for parole (no chance to be let out of jail early)
- Option 2 choices
- P1 remains silent
- P2 confesses
- outcome: P2 goes free & P1 serves the worst sentence
- Option 3 choices:
- both confess
- outcome: both serve the worst jail sentence but will be allowed "early parole" (let out early)
- Option 4 choices:
- both remain silent
- outcome: both will face a lesser charge and less jail time
Option | Best outcome
individually |
Worst outcome
individually |
Worst outcome
collectively |
Best outcome
collectively |
Highest risk
indivdiually |
Lowest risk
individually |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Option 1:
|
P1 goes free | P2 serves longest term | ✔ | ✔ | ||
Option 2:
|
P2 goes free | P1 serves longest term | ✔ | ↑ | ||
Option 3:
|
↑ | |||||
Option 4:
|
↑ | ↑ | ||||
- the most potentially beneficial option for themselves individually, they both will serve the longest jail term
- however, if both choose the
- even if choosing collectively would be more rational & mutually beneficial
- see https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/prisoner-dilemma/
rationing[edit | edit source]
scarcity[edit | edit source]
- aggregate supply