Common historical fallacies: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
** but even the most objectively-minded teacher has as a point of view, an underlying outlook
** but even the most objectively-minded teacher has as a point of view, an underlying outlook


== US History fallacies ==
== US History fallacies: general ==
 
=== George Washington didn't cut down a cherry tree ===


=== George Washington did not cut down a cherry tree ===
* that Washington cut down a cherry tree and, when confronted about it by his father, replied, "I cannot tell a lie" has been considered a fabrication
* that Washington cut down a cherry tree and, when confronted about it by his father, replied, "I cannot tell a lie" has been considered a fabrication
* Parson Weems told the story in the 5th edition of his "The Life of Washington" (1806)
* Parson Weems told the story in the 5th edition of his "The Life of Washington" (1806)
** long considered apocryphal (a made up story to make a valid point), there is no evidence that Washington <nowiki>''did not''</nowiki> cut down the cherry tree
** long considered apocryphal (a made up story to make a valid point), there is no evidence that Washington <nowiki>''did not''</nowiki> cut down the cherry tree
=== contrary evidence 1: the story is plausible ===
** whether or not apocryphal, Weems related the story to illustrate Washington's high character
** whether or not apocryphal, Weems related the story to illustrate Washington's high character
** but the story is not implausible (unlikely):
** but the story is not implausible (unlikely):
Line 18: Line 18:
*** a hatchet would be a very valuable gift for a young boy and one that would certainly not go unused
*** a hatchet would be a very valuable gift for a young boy and one that would certainly not go unused
*** a six-year old could plausibly chop down a small Cherry tree
*** a six-year old could plausibly chop down a small Cherry tree
* evidence of the story:
=== contrary evidence 2: primary source witness to the event ===
** Weems was told the story by an elderly woman who had been friends with the family  
* Weems was told the story by an elderly woman who had been friends with the family  
** it is, therefore, from a primary source (a witness)
** it is, therefore, from a primary source (a witness)
** Weems did not give her name, so she remains an anonymous primary source
** Weems did not give her name, so she remains an anonymous primary source
Line 27: Line 27:
** https://www.nps.gov/articles/george-washington-and-the-cherry-tree.htm
** https://www.nps.gov/articles/george-washington-and-the-cherry-tree.htm


=== The Declaration's "All men are created equal" only applied to white males ===
== The Declaration's "All men are created equal" only applied to white males ==
* the phrase "all men" logically refers to "all people" because:
* the phrase "all men" logically refers to "all people" because:
** as included in the Declaration of Independence, the clause "that all men are created equal",  
** as included in the Declaration of Independence, the clause "that all men are created equal",  
Line 59: Line 59:
|-
|-
|}
|}
== US History fallacies: slavery ==


=== Slavery was the basis of the colonial and antebellum American economy ===
=== Slavery was the basis of the colonial and antebellum American economy ===
* here we must distinguish between slave and free economies, generally North and South
* modern historians have argued that slavery was the basis for the entire US economy
* this entry will look into evidence for and against that claim
==== background notes on colonial slavery ====
* by 1790, Virginia and Maryland had by far the highest slave populations (w/ North Carolina following)
** slavery in the Upper South was focused on tobacco planting and processing
** however, with the advent of mass cotton production, demand for slaves grew in the deep South
*** 500,000-800,000 slaves were sold from the Upper to the Lower southern states
**** note that this movement of people constituted one of the largest forced migrations in history
**** In the book, "Uncle Tom's Cabin," Harriett Beecher Stowe called it "to be sold down the river"
** this expansion was significant in western portions of the South, principally in the Mississippi River valley that was part of the Louisiana Purchase
*** where lands were fertile, available and inexpensive
** as cotton production grew, the southern economy became focused on the slave system that sustained it
*** not all slaves produced cotton (about 56% of slaves worked on cotton plantations by 1860)
**** but most of those who did not produce cotton worked to support the cotton economy
**** as did poor whites
* sources:
** http://pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu/ushistory/chapter/the-economics-of-cotton/
** https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/167224
** https://reason.com/2018/07/19/slavery-did-not-make-america-r/
** https://networks.h-net.org/node/11465/discussions/4297558/poor-whites-antebellum-us-south-topical-guide
==== logical fallacy 1: slave-produced exports were the driving force of the antebellum U.S. economy ====
==== logical fallacy 1: slave-produced exports were the driving force of the antebellum U.S. economy ====
* while cotton represented a significant portion of antebellum exports,  
* while cotton represented a significant portion of antebellum exports,  
Line 114: Line 140:
|
|
|}
|}
 
* Note that about75% of total cotton production was exported
Year Exports GDP Exports as % of GDP
1820 0.07 0.07 10%
1830 0.07 1.01 6.90%
1840 0.12 1.55 7.70%
1850 0.14 2.56 5.40%
1860 0.33 4.32 7.60%
 
</div>
</div>


[[File:Slavery in the 13 colonies.jpg|thumb|Enslaved populations in the Thirteen Colonies in 1770.[1]]]
[[File:Slavery in the 13 colonies.jpg|thumb|Enslaved populations in the Thirteen Colonies in 1770.[1]]]
Line 264: Line 282:
**** just as an office building has a value but its economic output is measured not by its value but by the sum of its rents
**** just as an office building has a value but its economic output is measured not by its value but by the sum of its rents


==== logical fallacy 4: black population growth for about slavery ====
==== logical fallacy 4: black population growth higher without slavery ====
* according to the decennial Census count:
* according to the decennial Census count:
** only in the 1810 Census count did black population growth ''under slavery'' exceed that of non-black population growth  
** only in the 1810 Census count did black population growth ''under slavery'' exceed that of non-black population growth  
Line 413: Line 431:
|}
|}
</div>
</div>
=== Slavery was not profitable ===
* in the early to mid 20th century, Confederacy apologists and "Lost Cause" historians argued that slavery was not profitable and had stagnated by the time of the Civil War
** these historians argued that, as a result its unprofitability and inefficiency, slavery as an institution would have died off on its own in the American South
** and that more profitable and efficient uses of labor and capital would replace slavery
==== contrary evidence 1: antebellum South had highest per capital wealth ====
==== problem with contrary evidence 1: Southern wealth was tied  to land and slaves ====
* the principal source of the wealth of the slave South was due to land and slave speculation
** which drove up prices and thus values
** as a result,
==== contrary evidence 1: slavery was profitable ====
*
=== Slavery


=== Colonial and early Republic southern white slave owners & manumission ===
=== Colonial and early Republic southern white slave owners & manumission ===