Federalist No. 51: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Understanding Federalist No. 51: translating the text & the big ideas'''
'''Understanding Federalist 51: translating the text & the big ideas'''
<br><br>
<br><br>
See also:
* [[Federalist No. 51]]
* [[:Category:Federalist Papers|Federalist Papers entries (category page)]]
{{Federalist Papers}}


'''The Federalist papers'''
'''The Federalist papers'''


{{Federalist Papers}}
{{Federalist Papers}}
 
<br><br>
== Federalist No. 51 Background ==
== Federalist No. 51 background ==


* Federalists 37-84, in general, review the proposed structure of the federal government and discuss it's theoretical foundations in a republican form of government
* Federalists 37-84, in general, review the proposed structure of the federal government and discuss it's theoretical foundations in a republican form of government
Line 19: Line 24:
** Federalist 57: "'''The Alleged Tendency of the New Plan to Elevate the Few at the Expense of the Many"'''
** Federalist 57: "'''The Alleged Tendency of the New Plan to Elevate the Few at the Expense of the Many"'''


==Summary of purpose==
==Federalist No. 51 summary==
* Madison discusses the purposes and benefits of divided government and a system of "checks and balances"  
* Madison discusses the purposes and benefits of divided government and a system of "checks and balances"  
** = each divided portion of the government can "check" the other and exercise "balanced" powers
** = each divided portion of the government can "check" the other and exercise "balanced" powers
* Madison also addresses the paradox that government is necessary to inhibit human ambition
* Madison also addresses the paradox that government is necessary to inhibit human ambition
** "If men were angels, no government would be necessary"
** "'''''If men were angels, no government would be necessary'''''."
* while at the same time propelling it for one "faction" at the expense of others
* while at the same time propelling it for one "faction" at the expense of others
** the solution,, which Madison first proposed in Federalist No. 10, is  
** the solution,, which Madison first proposed in Federalist No. 10, is  
*** not to prohibit faction and ambition  
*** not to prohibit faction and ambition  
*** but to limit both through divided and balanced government  
*** but to limit both through divided and balanced government  
*** through a system of checks and balances,
*** making it difficult for any single faction to control all of them
*** making it difficult for any single faction to control all of them
*** = ""Ambition must be made to counteract ambition."
** thus creating a system by which, as Madison explains,
*** "'''''Ambition must be made to counteract ambition'''''."
* Madison also importantly addresses the need for checks and balances within the legislature itself, thus its bicameral (2 houses) form
* Madison also importantly addresses the need for checks and balances within the legislature itself, thus its bicameral (2 houses) form
* a significant element to Madison's argument is that a large republic with the federal system of checks and balances within the federal government and within the states themselves, would protect the liberties of the people
* a significant element to Madison's argument is that a large republic with the federal system of checks and balances within the federal government and within the states themselves, would protect the liberties of the people
Line 46: Line 53:
'''''<big>To the People of the State of New York:</big>'''''
'''''<big>To the People of the State of New York:</big>'''''
|cell style="background-color:#ffffe6"|
|cell style="background-color:#ffffe6"|
== Authorship ==
== Authorship ==


Line 111: Line 119:
** = protection of private (individual) rights are more important than the "public" (government) rights
** = protection of private (individual) rights are more important than the "public" (government) rights


Therefore, Madison argues, the "private interest" (rights) must not be "less requisite" than the "supreme powers of the State"
Therefore, Madison argues, the "private interest" (rights) must not be "less requisite" than the "supreme powers of the State"
|-
|-
|  
|