4,994
edits
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
* Shaw v. Reno , 1993) | * Shaw v. Reno , 1993) | ||
|- | |||
|'''Brown v. Board of Education''' | |||
|1954 | |||
|Warren | |||
|equal protection | |||
|Equal protection clause (14th amendment) | |||
| | |||
* unanimous ruling held that segregated schools were "inherently unequal" and thus violated the 14th amendment's equal protection clause regarding public school segregation | |||
* the ruling did not completely overturn ''Plessy'', as ''Brown'' applied only to public education, but it became the primary precedent for further challenges to ''de jure'' (in law) segregation | |||
* subsequent cases also addressed ''de facto'' (in fact or practice) segregation | |||
| | |||
*[[wikipedia:Cooper_v._Aaron|Cooper v. Aaron]] (1958: affirmed Brown and enforced desegregation) | |||
*[[wikipedia:Swann_v._Charlotte-Mecklenburg_Board_of_Education|Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education]] (1971: busing to promote racial integration in schools) | |||
*[[wikipedia:Milliken_v._Bradley|Milliken v. Bradley]] (1974: "busing"; distinguished between ''de jure'' and ''de facto'' segregation) | |||
|- | |||
|'''Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission''' | |||
|2010 | |||
|Roberts | |||
|campaign finance law | |||
|Free speech clause (1st amendment) | |||
| | |||
* held that "political spending" by organizations is protected speech | |||
* the case regarded advertising of a movie during a primary election season that was critical of Hillary Clinton and that violated a 2002 law, Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act that prohibited "electioneering communication" by corporations, non-profits or unions withing 30 days of a primary or 60 days of an election; the law was invalidated by the case | |||
| | |||
*[[wikipedia:McCutcheon_v._FEC|McCutcheon v. FEC]] (2014: expanded campaign finance limits but did not end them) | |||
|- | |||
|'''Engel v. Vitale''' | |||
|1962 | |||
|Warren | |||
| - prayer in public school | |||
- "separation of Church and State" doctrine | |||
|Establishment clause (1st amendment) | |||
| | |||
* ruled that official public school prayer (i.e., school-sponsored) violated the 1st amendment prohibition of government sponsored religion | |||
* the ruling affirmed the "wall of separation between Church and State," which is from a published letter by President Thomas Jefferson in 1802 | |||
* dissent: | |||
** Justice Stewart's argued that the Establishment clause prohibited creation of a state- (government) sponsored church and not the non-mandatory practice of religion within a public school | |||
| | |||
*[[wikipedia:Abington_School_District_v._Schempp|Abington School District v. Schempp]] (1963: banned public school-sponsored Bible reading) | |||
*[[wikipedia:Wallace_v._Jaffree|Wallace v. Jaffree]] (1985: banned school-sponsored prayer but allowed for school-sponsored moment of silence for individual meditation) | |||
|- | |||
|'''Gideon v. Wainwright''' | |||
|1963 | |||
|Warren | |||
| - public counsel | |||
- incorporation case | |||
|Right to counsel (6th amendment) | |||
| | |||
* Gideon requested but was denied a public attorney (Florida only allowed it for capital offenses) | |||
* the unanimous decision held that a state must provide counsel for criminal defendants who can not afford an attorney or who are otherwise incapable of representing themselves (incompetency or illiteracy) | |||
* ''Gideon'' is an incorporation case, as the 6th amendment right to counsel was applied state law via the 14th amendment's Due Process clause | |||
| | |||
*[[wikipedia:Powell_v._Alabama|Powell v. Alabama]] (1932: required state-sponsored counsel in capital crimes; it importantly incorporated the 6th amendment right via the 14th amendment's "due process" clause) | |||
for similar cases regarding criminal protections: | |||
*[[wikipedia:Massiah_v._United_States|Massiah v. United States]] (1964: prohibited use of statements by criminals who had counsel without that attorney present) | |||
*[[wikipedia:Miranda_v._Arizona|Miranda v. Arizona]] (1966: self-incrimination protections; incorporation of 5th amendment; see also [[wikipedia:Berghuis_v._Thompkins|Berghuis v. Thompkins]] 2010) | |||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Marbury v. Madison''' | |'''Marbury v. Madison''' | ||
Line 80: | Line 141: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''' | |'''McDonald v. Chicago''' | ||
| | |2010 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | - gun rights | ||
| | <nowiki>- incorporation case</nowiki> | ||
| | |||
* Second amendment | |||
| | | | ||
* | * asdf | ||
| | | | ||
* | * | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | |