Federalist No. 51: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


{{Federalist Papers}}
{{Federalist Papers}}
 
<br><br>
== Federalist No. 51 background ==
== Federalist No. 51 background ==


Line 23: Line 23:
** = each divided portion of the government can "check" the other and exercise "balanced" powers
** = each divided portion of the government can "check" the other and exercise "balanced" powers
* Madison also addresses the paradox that government is necessary to inhibit human ambition
* Madison also addresses the paradox that government is necessary to inhibit human ambition
** "If men were angels, no government would be necessary"
** "'''''If men were angels, no government would be necessary'''''."
* while at the same time propelling it for one "faction" at the expense of others
* while at the same time propelling it for one "faction" at the expense of others
** the solution,, which Madison first proposed in Federalist No. 10, is  
** the solution,, which Madison first proposed in Federalist No. 10, is  
*** not to prohibit faction and ambition  
*** not to prohibit faction and ambition  
*** but to limit both through divided and balanced government  
*** but to limit both through divided and balanced government  
*** through a system of checks and balances,
*** making it difficult for any single faction to control all of them
*** making it difficult for any single faction to control all of them
*** = "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition."
** thus creating a system by which, as Madison explains,
*** "'''''Ambition must be made to counteract ambition'''''."
* Madison also importantly addresses the need for checks and balances within the legislature itself, thus its bicameral (2 houses) form
* Madison also importantly addresses the need for checks and balances within the legislature itself, thus its bicameral (2 houses) form
* a significant element to Madison's argument is that a large republic with the federal system of checks and balances within the federal government and within the states themselves, would protect the liberties of the people
* a significant element to Madison's argument is that a large republic with the federal system of checks and balances within the federal government and within the states themselves, would protect the liberties of the people
Line 112: Line 114:
** = protection of private (individual) rights are more important than the "public" (government) rights
** = protection of private (individual) rights are more important than the "public" (government) rights


Therefore, Madison argues, the "private interest" (rights) must not be "less requisite" than the "supreme powers of the State"
Therefore, Madison argues, the "private interest" (rights) must not be "less requisite" than the "supreme powers of the State"
|-
|-
|  
|